|
Post by DancyGeorgia on Aug 19, 2012 19:37:44 GMT -5
Adam has said many times that this is NOT what the song is about! It's about stripping away the B.S., i.e,., the emotional barriers. Yes, I know that is what he says, but a radio listener will have no way of knowing that I will undoubtedly think of the sexual interpretation. That is true. And unfortunately, if it was coming from a straight guy or gal it would be played all over radio.
|
|
|
Post by DancyGeorgia on Aug 19, 2012 19:40:49 GMT -5
Polly @polly2101 Omg. Its genious. @adamlambert you should see it. I dont know who made this Masterpiece pic.twitter.com/SPYygdaXGreat drawing of Adam - looks a good bit like Elvis. P.S. How do I copy over an image from a web link like this? Do I have to copy it into my photobucket first?
|
|
|
Post by 4Ms on Aug 19, 2012 19:46:20 GMT -5
Polly @polly2101 Omg. Its genious. @adamlambert you should see it. I dont know who made this Masterpiece pic.twitter.com/SPYygdaXGreat drawing of Adam - looks a good bit like Elvis. P.S. How do I copy over an image from a web link like this? Do I have to copy it into my photobucket first? You can right-click-save on the photo or enter this url into your Photobucket: p.twimg.com/A0rpBCaCEAASfi6.jpg
|
|
|
Post by 4Ms on Aug 19, 2012 19:55:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by SusieFierce on Aug 19, 2012 19:59:19 GMT -5
I was JUST thinking that about BTIKM. It took me a while to stop skipping it cause I was so obsessed with the new songs but I really think it fits on the album, sounds so much like Adam and I totally understand why they picked it for a single. It is easy to have 20/20 hindsight and for us all to blame RCA for stuff but, gosh darn it, all these songs should have gotten attention. I agree. I don't know that BTIKM would have jumped out as a "radio single," but the vocal is amazing and it's a complex, mature song. BTW I HATE the term "radio friendly" and think it is laden w/BS and intangibles that no one can pinpoint. I actually think radio is victim to the whims of Clear Channel corporate and they can make or break anyone they want to ... or at least give them a fighting chance. This is why I'm on "Trespassing" bandwagon: I think the song is thematically and stylistically different enough to grab people's attention. Everyone keeps going along the MO of "fitting in," where I think Adam's strength lies in busting down doors.
|
|
Avari
Member
Twitter: @AvariOnline
Posts: 1,021
Location:
|
Post by Avari on Aug 19, 2012 20:03:16 GMT -5
Adam has said many times that this is NOT what the song is about! It's about stripping away the B.S., i.e,., the emotional barriers. LO, yes. That is his family friendly explanation. Live, he is telling people to take something off. "Take it off, try me on" is pretty damn sexy in my book!! I don't think it will ever be a single. Nope, not to me. I mean, he giggles after he says "try me on". Even if I didn't have the background on what the meaning of the song was, the album version still would sound cute rather than sexy to my ears. But yes, live is a whole other story. :D
|
|
|
Post by melliemom on Aug 19, 2012 20:07:04 GMT -5
LO, yes. That is his family friendly explanation. Live, he is telling people to take something off. "Take it off, try me on" is pretty damn sexy in my book!! I don't think it will ever be a single. Nope, not to me. I mean, he giggles after he says "try me on". Even if I didn't have the background on what the meaning of the song was, the album version still would sound cute rather than sexy to my ears. But yes, live is a whole other story. :D IMHO There are folks out there who don't want Adam to succeed.. "They have to protect the children"
|
|
Avari
Member
Twitter: @AvariOnline
Posts: 1,021
Location:
|
Post by Avari on Aug 19, 2012 20:08:08 GMT -5
This is why I'm on "Trespassing" bandwagon: I think the song is thematically and stylistically different enough to grab people's attention. Everyone keeps going along the MO of "fitting in," where I think Adam's strength lies in busting down doors. Yes! 1000 times yes!!
|
|
|
Post by jean1010 on Aug 19, 2012 20:08:44 GMT -5
I was JUST thinking that about BTIKM. It took me a while to stop skipping it cause I was so obsessed with the new songs but I really think it fits on the album, sounds so much like Adam and I totally understand why they picked it for a single. It is easy to have 20/20 hindsight and for us all to blame RCA for stuff but, gosh darn it, all these songs should have gotten attention. I agree. I don't know that BTIKM would have jumped out as a "radio single," but the vocal is amazing and it's a complex, mature song. BTW I HATE the term "radio friendly" and think it is laden w/BS and intangibles that no one can pinpoint. I actually think radio is victim to the whims of Clear Channel corporate and they can make or break anyone they want to ... or at least give them a fighting chance. This is why I'm on "Trespassing" bandwagon: I think the song is thematically and stylistically different enough to grab people's attention. Everyone keeps going along the MO of "fitting in," where I think Adam's strength lies in busting down doors. I agree with everything you said. I think RCA picked a song they thought would fit in or was radio friendly, but that made it not stand out enough. I hope and think they will have better luck with something unique that doesn't fit in because it doesn't sound like so much of what is being played. I think Somebody I Used to Know is an example of a smash that sounded unique. This is the reason I think Shady could be a smash.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2012 20:16:26 GMT -5
[/IMG] [/quote] Me too -- ALOT!
|
|