belle
Member
Posts: 4,732
Location:
|
Post by belle on Nov 13, 2012 17:31:11 GMT -5
|
|
scorpio
Member
Posts: 814
Location:
|
Post by scorpio on Nov 13, 2012 17:31:20 GMT -5
|
|
Albiku
Member
@Albiku
Posts: 3,021
Location:
|
Post by Albiku on Nov 13, 2012 17:31:39 GMT -5
The pitch in Underneath was lowered... a step? A step and a half? Did someone check?
|
|
|
|
Post by cassie on Nov 13, 2012 17:32:11 GMT -5
Underneath is a very, VERY difficult song to sing live. Gotta wait for Cassie to comment, but here's what I thought: The song was lowered. Vocals sounded amazing, but sometimes I thought he sounded a little bit tired. I didn't like the girls, particularly at 1:07. In my opinion, Adam fucked up a bit in 1:29... lol But 1:31 was amazing. I loved it. [img src=" ![]() i770.photobucket.com/albums/xx348/Quu3/Adam%20Smilys/Other%20Smileys/wub.gif"] [/IMG] [/quote] Okay, my opinions. FWIW. Underneath is a song in progress. We know that it takes Adam several performances of a song before it really sits within his body and voice. At this point, I think he is still playing with it, figuring out what works for him and the audience. Yes, at 1:29 he was unsure of exactly where he wanted the melody to go, but he found the slot a couple of seconds later, didn't he? From the first seconds of listening, something sounded different in the tone of his voice. I'm still trying to figure out what it is, much less how to explain it. The ring is still there, but there is also something darker in the tone or timbre. Like he is accessing a different resonance in his body that is more like a baritone's. It's got a bit more weight or heft. Sorry, I can't explain it better. It is something I can feel in my own body; like he is opening up an additional chamber in his chest for more depth. While I love the studio version, I thought that the electronics and instrumentation got a little too blustery towards the latter half of the song. For that reason, I prefer this stripped back version. But, the VJJs have to go back to rehearsal. Not good. Not on pitch. Murky. Hope we get a better video of the whole song. It is something I want to listen to more closely. Give him a few more performances and I predict there will not be a dry eye in the audience. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2012 17:32:39 GMT -5
That's some fancy ass straight jacket!!! Do they normally look this way?
|
|
|
|
Post by Catzmadam on Nov 13, 2012 17:33:50 GMT -5
lol... the leather fringes thang looks like he has married his purple Voodoo coat with his leather poncho #bestofbothworlds #smart ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by adamme on Nov 13, 2012 17:35:32 GMT -5
Giselle @teaandbutterpie Guys he did a cover of "Are You Gonna Go My Way" by Lenny Kravitz! Sounded a bit like Purple Haze - WANT THE VIDEO NOW |
|
Albiku
Member
@Albiku
Posts: 3,021
Location:
|
Post by Albiku on Nov 13, 2012 17:36:16 GMT -5
Underneath is a very, VERY difficult song to sing live. Gotta wait for Cassie to comment, but here's what I thought: The song was lowered. Vocals sounded amazing, but sometimes I thought he sounded a little bit tired. I didn't like the girls, particularly at 1:07. In my opinion, Adam fucked up a bit in 1:29... lol But 1:31 was amazing. I loved it. [img src=" ![]() i770.photobucket.com/albums/xx348/Quu3/Adam%20Smilys/Other%20Smileys/wub.gif"] [/IMG] [/quote] Okay, my opinions. FWIW. Underneath is a song in progress. We know that it takes Adam several performances of a song before it really sits within his body and voice. At this point, I think he is still playing with it, figuring out what works for him and the audience. Yes, at 1:29 he was unsure of exactly where he wanted the melody to go, but he found the slot a couple of seconds later, didn't he? From the first seconds of listening, something sounded different in the tone of his voice. I'm still trying to figure out what it is, much less how to explain it. The ring is still there, but there is also something darker in the tone or timbre. Like he is accessing a different resonance in his body that is more like a baritone's. It's got a bit more weight or heft. Sorry, I can't explain it better. It is something I can feel in my own body; like he is opening up an additional chamber in his chest for more depth. While I love the studio version, I thought that the electronics and instrumentation got a little too blustery towards the latter half of the song. For that reason, I prefer this stripped back version. But, the VJJs have to go back to rehearsal. Not good. Not on pitch. Murky. Hope we get a better video of the whole song. It is something I want to listen to more closely. Give him a few more performances and I predict there will not be a dry eye in the audience. [/quote] Yeah, that's why I said that 1:31 was amazing.  I wish we had a video of the whole song too... :-/ And yeah, I didn't like the VJJs at all. Love your posts.  |
|
|
|
Post by cassie on Nov 13, 2012 17:37:38 GMT -5
The pitch in Underneath was lowered... a step? A step and a half? Did someone check? A full step. |
|
|
|
Post by gelly14 on Nov 13, 2012 17:38:02 GMT -5
 ANGELA MEYER @angie_MEYER @adamlambert thanks for coming back on stage !!!! pic.twitter.com/7AKX8EKj |
|
I wish we had a video of the whole song too... :-/
