|
|
Post by seoulmate on Jul 1, 2013 0:47:42 GMT -5
No, I haven't had any virus warnings with ATOP, but this afternoon when I tried to refresh the page I got an entire page of this:  Nothing is impossible but there should be no virus issues here. Seoulmate -- that is raw code -- did it go away when you refreshed? I had to refresh a few times before it finally went away. |
|
|
|
Post by Craazyforadam on Jul 1, 2013 9:51:06 GMT -5
www.celebritytalent.net/sampletalent/index.php?next=20&refine=fee&cat=350000-499999Kelly is listed in the 350K - 499K group on the site. So is Daughtry. Otherwise, what Q3 already said. "not accurate, but directionally correct" My impression is that this site is showing data from 2011. That is why Lauren and Scotty are listed with red hot prices that in 2013 probably would not be true anymore (at least not for Lauren) and most of the Season 9 folks are all trending too high by today's standards. Daughtry, Achuletta and Cook have come down from those high prices since then. Adam may even have climbed a little, but certainly held constant against that otherwise prevailing trend for idols to go down in booking value over time. The noteworthy part for me is that there are two artists who have climbed out of the idol box on this site and are only found, if you search via amount, rather than via American Idol as search term. They are Kelly and Carrie. I think that Adam deserves to be out of that too now with his singing career, a number 1 album, Queen and also his LGBT activities. But clearly this site does not yet agree. Some things though could be influenced by his own management. i.e. the bio shown here, besides being idol centric, is a total mess. Some of it does not even make sense. Example: "Adam Lambert's vocal range, along with his jet-black hair and heavy mascara, earned him comparisons to glam rockers like Freddie Mercury and Gene Simmons." What? His jet-black hair reminded of Freddie and Gene? His vocal range reminds of Gene Simmons? Is this a game of 'How many insults can you throw into one bio?' It is imo DMG's job to correct such stuff. With outdated information on AO to begin with, then in such listings, and in tons of other places, overall you do impede the image for the artist you represent. Not saying that this site is the highest priority, just trying to use today's example to make a point. www.celebritytalent.net/sampletalent/1207/adam-lambert/
|
|
