|
Post by melliemom on Feb 12, 2015 17:00:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Q3 on Feb 12, 2015 17:01:44 GMT -5
You can do it as an attachment -- up to a 1 MB each. Please do not attach a whole lot of files because I have to pay for storage for attachments. Save this for very special things. I had no idea that you had to pay for storage for attachments. I, also, have no idea how many times I've done attached pics. I would take them all back, if I knew where to look. Can you just delete anything of mine? Please don't delete anything. You are fine, better than fine. You embed your photos. That does not cost me anything. Attaching a file is different. You do it with the button on the upper right of the reply box. And it would only matter if someone attached a 100 MG of files.
|
|
|
Post by seoulmate on Feb 12, 2015 17:21:43 GMT -5
Thank you 4ms - this is beautiful!!! Thanx. I hate photobucket. No matter how many times I choose not to have pics redirected back to PB, it still happens. Will it let you see the jumbo size? 4Ms, yes, I could see the jumbo size just fine when I clicked on the pic! It's gorgeous!! I'm hating fuckitbucket, too, even worse than usual. The glitches are driving me CRAZY.
|
|
|
Post by houselady on Feb 12, 2015 17:30:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by houselady on Feb 12, 2015 17:31:41 GMT -5
|
|
3ku1
Member
Posts: 3,009
Location:
|
Post by 3ku1 on Feb 12, 2015 17:45:15 GMT -5
Got a question. Would you consider this QAL tour a CO-Headline tour. I mean based on Adam and Queen being co headlines. I know acts co headline all the time. Obviousley they are singing the same music, so QAL is vastly different. But would this be considered a co headline tour? Wondering as depending on the success of TOH. Would Adam theoretically speaking co headline with another act? Or Open? I have no problem with that. I mean he is not going to go solo in big stadiums on his own, without another act. Guess it all depends on the success of TOH, and how many hit singles he gets. If he gets several, then he can support a 2 hr show. Prob around 2000-5000. As more the success, the bigger the size of his tour gets. Sorry if this is OT, but its interesting in how he well tour next era.
|
|
talon
Member
Posts: 2,933
Location:
|
Post by talon on Feb 12, 2015 18:06:06 GMT -5
No. A Co-headline tour would be Adam performing a set and Queen performing a set. This is still considered a Queen tour. It's Queen performing Queen's music with a guest frontman (which is the + Adam Lambert part). QPR was also still a Queen tour...Paul even performed a few of his songs with Queen but it was still a Queen tour.
And I hesitate to say this here as not to provoke or be offensive as it is my opinion -- but I would think that even if TOH is big, it would still be Adam opening for Queen rather than a Co-Headlining tour unless it is HUGE to the point where Adam is selling out arenas on his own...THEN it would enter into a co-headlining tour and even then only if Adam did a set of his own music and Queen did a set of their own music OR if the setlist was 50/50 Adam music/Queen music...
|
|
|
Post by csquared on Feb 12, 2015 18:11:39 GMT -5
Got a question. Would you consider this QAL tour a CO-Headline tour. I mean based on Adam and Queen being co headlines. I know acts co headline all the time. Obviousley they are singing the same music, so QAL is vastly different. But would this be considered a co headline tour? Wondering as depending on the success of TOH. Would Adam theoretically speaking co headline with another act? Or Open? I have no problem with that. I mean he is not going to go solo in big stadiums on his own, without another act. Guess it all depends on the success of TOH, and how many hit singles he gets. If he gets several, then he can support a 2 hr show. Prob around 2000-5000. As more the success, the bigger the size of his tour gets. Sorry if this is OT, but its interesting in how he well tour next era. Adam isn't doing his own music on this tour, so my guess is it wouldn't be considered a co-headlining tour. And I wonder at this point if he's a "special guest" or part of the band? If if he gets a couple of big hits off TOH, I would guess, on the basis of his past tours, that 5,000 would be almost a minimum to start with. Or maybe I should say I would hope! I know era 1 was a long time ago, but he seemed to pretty easily fill up close to 5,000 then. The show I went to, Puyallup Washington, was about 75% full and was in a venue holding about 10,000.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2015 18:18:01 GMT -5
No. A Co-headline tour would be Adam performing a set and Queen performing a set. This is still considered a Queen tour. It's Queen performing Queen's music with a guest frontman (which is the + Adam Lambert part). QPR was also still a Queen tour...Paul even performed a few of his songs with Queen but it was still a Queen tour. And I hesitate to say this here as not to provoke or be offensive as it is my opinion -- but I would think that even if TOH is big, it would still be Adam opening for Queen rather than a Co-Headlining tour unless it is HUGE to the point where Adam is selling out arenas on his own...THEN it would enter into a co-headlining tour and even then only if Adam did a set of his own music and Queen did a set of their own music OR if the setlist was 50/50 Adam music/Queen music... No offense taken. I agree completely with your POV.
|
|
3ku1
Member
Posts: 3,009
Location:
|
Post by 3ku1 on Feb 12, 2015 18:24:29 GMT -5
Nah I agree. I think Adam is very luckey to be performing with Queen at Arenas and Stadiums. He won't be doing that solo (not for a while anyway). Even if he gets several hits, he may still need a co headline. Or just have a opener for him. I would love a collab with Katy Perry. Shes not touring in a while, finished her singles off her album, in terms of radio release. So shes always liked Adam. And not to mention her fanbase, she has over 40 million followers on twitter. So guess its all about expanding Adams fanbase. I see clubs and theatres on his tour. But well see how his first single goes in April. I have no idea what it well sound like but I am sure it well be great.
|
|