Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2015 19:04:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on Sept 16, 2015 19:05:57 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2015 19:06:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by wal on Sept 16, 2015 19:09:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by 4EverAdam on Sept 16, 2015 19:09:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on Sept 16, 2015 19:09:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on Sept 16, 2015 19:11:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by cassie on Sept 16, 2015 19:12:26 GMT -5
So taking a photographers photo, removing his water marks and adding your own is now okay?? Am I missing something here? I wondered the same thing. I have enjoyed having non-watermarked pics for my collection, and even for my personal calendar (which I have NEVER sold or used for profit). But, for someone to claim a photo as their own is blatant stealing IMO. Not cool. |
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on Sept 16, 2015 19:13:28 GMT -5
In the arena.
|
|
|
|
Post by 4EverAdam on Sept 16, 2015 19:14:35 GMT -5
|
|
