Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2015 19:32:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by wal on Sept 16, 2015 19:34:53 GMT -5
Just wondering if the Periscope stream is the only one we might have.....any ideas? (I can't get Periscope on my ipad and it means I have to get out of bed at 2am to go downstairs to my desktop..... only for Adam!....  ) We might get audio stream: mixlr.com/leathers-flame/ |
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on Sept 16, 2015 19:34:51 GMT -5
We got half an hour left to wait! Coffee...check water....check ear phones..check READY!!    |
|
|
|
Post by Q3 on Sept 16, 2015 19:34:58 GMT -5
Oh, there is no long catwalk for Adam. :( |
|
SophieB
Member
Posts: 3,508
Location:
|
Post by SophieB on Sept 16, 2015 19:35:49 GMT -5
Thanks, Wal...
|
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on Sept 16, 2015 19:36:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Q3 on Sept 16, 2015 19:38:08 GMT -5
So taking a photographers photo, removing his water marks and adding your own is now okay?? Am I missing something here? I wondered the same thing. I have enjoyed having non-watermarked pics for my collection, and even for my personal calendar (which I have NEVER sold or used for profit). But, for someone to claim a photo as their own is blatant stealing IMO. Not cool. She is paying for the rights -- same as JustJared.com does. Perfectly legal and the photographers get paid. Personally, I wish she would add the photographer credits but she is not stealing anything. ETA: Just because she is paying for the right to these photos being on her site, does not mean they are legal on other commercial sites or for other purposes. |
|
|
|
Post by wal on Sept 16, 2015 19:39:00 GMT -5
YW! Print HD @printhd 1m1 minute ago Sao Paulo, Brazil Já já ! Queen + Adam Lambert @ Ginásio do Ibirapuera instagram.com/p/7tjrcJCboP/ |
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on Sept 16, 2015 19:41:00 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2015 19:42:32 GMT -5
|
|
