|
|
Post by 4EverAdam on Sept 16, 2015 19:44:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on Sept 16, 2015 19:45:57 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2015 19:46:14 GMT -5
I wondered the same thing. I have enjoyed having non-watermarked pics for my collection, and even for my personal calendar (which I have NEVER sold or used for profit). But, for someone to claim a photo as their own is blatant stealing IMO. Not cool. She is paying for the rights -- same as JustJared.com does. Perfectly legal and the photographers get paid. Personally, I wish she would add the photographer credits but she is not stealing anything. ETA: Just because she is paying for the right to these photos being on her site, does not mean they are legal on other commercial sites or for other purposes. Good to know they are being properly purchased. They came across labeled "ICYMI: Edits I've of done of @adamlambert pictures from FAULT", the use of the word EDIT is what caught my attention. |
|
dotsgirl02
Member
Now have a 2 year old male rescue named Remy.
Posts: 521
Location:
|
Post by dotsgirl02 on Sept 16, 2015 19:46:24 GMT -5
We know QAL is always late, right? Anticipation
|
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on Sept 16, 2015 19:46:48 GMT -5
しぇみぃ @shemeet 24m24 minutes ago
載ってた！載ってた載ってた載ってたー！アダムーーー????????
Translated from Japanese by Bing Wrong translation?
I've found! I've found I've found on hooray! Adam here ????????
|
|
|
|
Post by wal on Sept 16, 2015 19:48:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Q3 on Sept 16, 2015 19:49:46 GMT -5
She is paying for the rights -- same as JustJared.com does. Perfectly legal and the photographers get paid. Personally, I wish she would add the photographer credits but she is not stealing anything. ETA: Just because she is paying for the right to these photos being on her site, does not mean they are legal on other commercial sites or for other purposes. Good to know they are being properly purchased. They came across labeled "ICYMI: Edits I've of done of @adamlambert pictures from FAULT", the use of the word EDIT is what caught my attention. I am not certain about all the photos on her site but I am sure she is paying for the Getty and other photo service photos. |
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on Sept 16, 2015 19:49:47 GMT -5
IT SOUNDS GREAT!!  |
|
|
|
Post by cassie on Sept 16, 2015 19:49:56 GMT -5
I wondered the same thing. I have enjoyed having non-watermarked pics for my collection, and even for my personal calendar (which I have NEVER sold or used for profit). But, for someone to claim a photo as their own is blatant stealing IMO. Not cool. She is paying for the rights -- same as JustJared.com does. Perfectly legal and the photographers get paid. Personally, I wish she would add the photographer credits but she is not stealing anything. ETA: Just because she is paying for the right to these photos being on her site, does not mean they are legal on other commercial sites or for other purposes. Oh. My bad. Thanks for clarifying. Proof I shouldn't be judging others. |
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on Sept 16, 2015 19:50:08 GMT -5
|
|
