Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2016 17:38:53 GMT -5
Cute! Making pretend cakes to go with pretend birthdays. 1/1 is obviously a very popular choice :D  |
|
|
|
Post by csquared on Jan 1, 2016 17:43:02 GMT -5
We do a lot of guessing on this board as to what Adam likes or not, posted or not, etc etc etc. I thinks he knows he has a solid fan base and gets a kick out of all of it, no matter what we're talking about! That's my guess anyway! lol I find it ridiculous that some think they know how he feels. Someone on this board said "this is Adam we're talking about", and I agree. I love raunchy, glitter, glam Adam and hope he's not conforming just evolving! He will do what he has to do to perform certain places but he will remain true to himself I believe!  I'm probably really stepping in it now, but when people say they want "raunchy" Adam, exactly what do they want him to do onstage? I suppose it depends on each person's definition of raunchy, lol. I'm just curious, because occasionally he's done things that I consider raunch/silly and not sexy and that I don't particularly enjoy (swallowing the mic, and certain gestures, for example) but other people seem to love and want more of. And yes, I know it's Adam's choice what to do or not do onstage, but like many performers he probably does certain things he knows will get a reaction from the audience. IMO! I'm NOT presuming to know what he's thinking. And I guess it boils down to what each of us likes. Whatever. Don't mind my rambles. |
|
|
|
Post by cheriemelissa on Jan 1, 2016 17:56:28 GMT -5
We do a lot of guessing on this board as to what Adam likes or not, posted or not, etc etc etc. I thinks he knows he has a solid fan base and gets a kick out of all of it, no matter what we're talking about! That's my guess anyway! lol I find it ridiculous that some think they know how he feels. Someone on this board said "this is Adam we're talking about", and I agree. I love raunchy, glitter, glam Adam and hope he's not conforming just evolving! He will do what he has to do to perform certain places but he will remain true to himself I believe! I'm probably really stepping in it now, but when people say they want "raunchy" Adam, exactly what do they want him to do onstage? I suppose it depends on each person's definition of raunchy, lol. I'm just curious, because occasionally he's done things that I consider raunch/silly and not sexy and that I don't particularly enjoy (swallowing the mic, and certain gestures, for example) but other people seem to love and want more of. And yes, I know it's Adam's choice what to do or not do onstage, but like many performers he probably does certain things he knows will get a reaction from the audience. IMO! I'm NOT presuming to know what he's thinking. And I guess it boils down to what each of us likes. Whatever. Don't mind my rambles. It's OK to ramble, we all do! To show you what I mean by raunchy, my favorite performance of his is Purple Haze/WLL in Cologne. It had it all, gorgeous Adam, sexy Adam and vocals beyond . He just let loose and I loved it! Now I know he can't perform that way every time but in concert, oh ya!!!!!!!!  |
|
|
|
Post by rihannsu on Jan 1, 2016 18:00:04 GMT -5
regarding adam saying it himself, well, that was 6 years ago and he was likely just repeated what he saw his fans discussing. just call it his dick/cock/wang/crotch. grown women using a pet name for a stranger's penis is creepy. plus, I think we are well past using "glam" in conjunction with every word related to adam. glamily is another term I could never get behind. I see that terrance is trying to revive it Terrance isn't reviving it, it never went away as Adam uses it regularly. |
|
FanOfTheMan
Member
Love Our Guy!
Posts: 4,205
Location:
|
Post by FanOfTheMan on Jan 1, 2016 18:02:35 GMT -5
I totally agree with this but have been afraid to say it and be deemed critical of other fans' choices. I guess people consider it all in fun, but it's really objectifying. How many of us would like to have people leering at our breasts (or crotches!) for example? Would we feel the same if some fandom was forever commenting on a female musician that way? Yes, Adam is sexy and sexual, but he's always seemed to me to be a little uncomfortable when "the GB" is mentioned (thank god rarely) in interviews. I think it comes down to variations of "boundaries" within the fandom and different understandings of humor, but I get easily creeped out when Adam's GB gets discussed. I too find it objectifying, so I would stay away from such discussions. Still, I find him very sexy in fitted pants, preferably leather pants, but it's more the whole appearance versus the focus on one body part. The GMA outfit is still my favorite to date. Totally agree with both these posts. I try to scroll past the GB discussions/remarks because I find them over-the-line disrespectful and objectifying. I feel bad and uncomfortable when I read them.  |
|
|
|
Post by skaschep on Jan 1, 2016 18:03:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by stampsgal on Jan 1, 2016 18:12:35 GMT -5
Does anyone else remember Adam responding to a question about his favorite "part" of himself with GB? Interview with "Jim Cantiello" of MTV ...sometime after the historic season of Idol finished. Adam was wearing a bright blue/black plaid shirt. Might take a bit to find the YouTube. Edit: I do not think this is the interview you may be thinking of as I think Adam just implied that was his fav body part. Having no luck finding it... A lot of his articles are still around but the vids attached to the interviews are not in Jim's old " news site". Someone may have more luck in finding the video. OK...found this conversation on where else...Adamtopia!!! He does use the term!!!!  This was a long time ago...and Adam has grown as a young adult through those 8 years. Jan 8 2012---page 9-10 range...conversation about the video. It is on page 10. And this is the photobucket video ...if interested...click on the link as it does not come up directly as a video.
s954.photobucket.com/user/mililac/media/2009%20Jim%20Cantiello/AdamLambertLoveHisIntenseFans2.mp4.html |
|
|
|
Post by DancyGeorgia on Jan 1, 2016 18:33:46 GMT -5
!0,000 bought tickets by Dec 31....Hmmm gee...20,000 empty seats Well the voices carry on the sound system in that kind of venue so the 7 hours of acts would at least be heard by the 300,000 who milled in/out and around the area. edit: Wow my first post of 2016...was a tad on the not so upbeat side. To add a bit of a "positive punch". That picture Adam liked...that Cassie so kindly took out of instagram so I could save it ...how could I not  ... I have stared at it far too long. Swoon worthy. Do we know that the place had 30,000 seats for sale? How many were sole last year? |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2016 18:41:36 GMT -5
!0,000 bought tickets by Dec 31....Hmmm gee...20,000 empty seats Well the voices carry on the sound system in that kind of venue so the 7 hours of acts would at least be heard by the 300,000 who milled in/out and around the area. edit: Wow my first post of 2016...was a tad on the not so upbeat side. To add a bit of a "positive punch". That picture Adam liked...that Cassie so kindly took out of instagram so I could save it ...how could I not ... I have stared at it far too long. Swoon worthy. Do we know that the place had 30,000 seats for sale? How many were sole last year? It sure didn't look like it could hold 30K from the videos. I was surprised at how small the seated area looked, actually. And most of it was seated. The mosh pit was small! |
|
|
|
Post by stampsgal on Jan 1, 2016 18:48:54 GMT -5
!0,000 bought tickets by Dec 31....Hmmm gee...20,000 empty seats Well the voices carry on the sound system in that kind of venue so the 7 hours of acts would at least be heard by the 300,000 who milled in/out and around the area. edit: Wow my first post of 2016...was a tad on the not so upbeat side. To add a bit of a "positive punch". That picture Adam liked...that Cassie so kindly took out of instagram so I could save it ...how could I not ... I have stared at it far too long. Swoon worthy. Do we know that the place had 30,000 seats for sale? How many were sole last year? Gee I thought I read many times there was room for 30,000...cannot say exactly where I read it. So I went googling... A trip advisory site mentioned ---not to worry about tickets for 2015 as they never sell out. And I copied from that site....this ....for the ..2014 show "The press eventually mentioned an attendance of 18,000 (the Float gallery seats 30,000), so the rest of the usual 200,000 crowd was milling about elsewhere in Marina Bay. Tickets will almost certainly be available at the door." Edit:  I was only commenting on what I read re tickets...if wrong...It would certainly change my concern. Still it would seem 8,000 less than 2014 |
|
I was only commenting on what I read re tickets...if wrong...It would certainly change my concern.