oracle
Member
Posts: 583
Location:
|
Post by oracle on Mar 20, 2016 21:45:08 GMT -5
Disclaimer: I'm not going to PM anyone the songs, I don't want to be held responsible for anything. If you really really really really desire to hear the track and cannot wait a few more days for the song's release, you can still access them on Warner's site through a process that some may find tedious. If you're up for the challenge, instructions are on the Members Only > DL Links thread. But please, don't PM me asking me for the links. And if you get the song, please don't share it with anyone, just share your impressions of it.My impressions of it? It's a very, very chill house track. Adam starts singing in a very low, "chill" voice. Not heavy EDM. I LOVE the chorus! Adam's singing melody during the chorus is beautiful. Instrumental break we've all heard in those live snippets, it's a earworm! This song, however, doesn't show off Adam's range. He has probably only 1 high note in this song. But this song, I can already imagine, has the potential do well on Pop radio! Great melody, great instrumental break! Now that I think of it... Is this WBR's plan? WTTS as a sentimental spring track, and CGH as a great summer track. Maybe. I'm just loving both songs now -- you will get to enjoy both in just a few days! I disagree. I don't consider this "very, very chill". It's actual kinda boppy. A very Japanese-sounding beat to it. He sounds quite sexy in parts. Like buttah. Me likey |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2016 21:48:20 GMT -5
It's not okay if it's a hacked version from WBR. First things first, it's NOT a hacked version. As long as the file is in the source code of a publicly available website, it's public. Not hacked. Completely public. Yea they hid it deep in the source code, so that no one would find it, but it's still public. Secondly, I was wrong to post the links on the Atop thread just now, because that was SHARING. That's why, now, for anyone who is dying to listen to the song, can listen to it for themselves by trying to find it on the public site. ETA: Hacking implies "unauthorised access" to data in a system or computer. There was no form of authorisation that I had to get through in order to listen to the song. Please use your words right. |
|
ghost
Member
Posts: 1,684
Location:
|
Post by ghost on Mar 20, 2016 21:48:46 GMT -5
So if Ghost records it playing on his computer on his mobile phone and puts it up on YouTube, you'd be okay with that? No, because that would be a recording of the official track. However, a fan recording the song on their phone at a loud festival with a bunch audience noise distorting the actual music is not the same. It's not ideal but musicians EXPECT, in 2016, that if they play their music at a festival, especially DJs, people will be recording the experience. That's not a leak. Can we stop with this discussion already? This is a leak, because Warner put the damn files up on a public site. Is it wrong to share a leak? The answer to that question is the same as the answer to this: is it wrong to share a publicly available link? The way I look at this, if you are able to get your hands on smth exclusive legally (I did), great for you. But if you feel like not sharing it is the right thing to do, then don't share it. That's why I'm not sharing it anymore. Also, I shared those bloody tracks for those who want to enjoy it. And Warner took down the links. Now those who want to listen to it can go get it for themselves. This is a pointless discussion. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2016 21:49:39 GMT -5
Lÿndsey Parker @lyndseyparker 7h .@nakia driving though Austin while cranking @adamlambert's version of "No Boundaries." This is my life. http://instagr.am/p/BDL9WDrFs40 Waaait a second. Is that the guy from The Voice a few years ago that CeeLo gave 'Whattaya Want from Me' to & Foot-in-Mouth-Levine said something like "I bet you sang that better than the original artist" ... that guy? |
|
|
|
Post by adamme on Mar 20, 2016 21:50:15 GMT -5
Disclaimer: I'm not going to PM anyone the songs, I don't want to be held responsible for anything. If you really really really really desire to hear the track and cannot wait a few more days for the song's release, you can still access them on Warner's site through a process that some may find tedious. If you're up for the challenge, instructions are on the Members Only > DL Links thread. But please, don't PM me asking me for the links. And if you get the song, please don't share it with anyone, just share your impressions of it.My impressions of it? It's a very, very chill house track. Adam starts singing in a very low, "chill" voice. Not heavy EDM. I LOVE the chorus! Adam's singing melody during the chorus is beautiful. Instrumental break we've all heard in those live snippets, it's a earworm! This song, however, doesn't show off Adam's range. He has probably only 1 high note in this song. But this song, I can already imagine, has the potential do well on Pop radio! Great melody, great instrumental break! Now that I think of it... Is this WBR's plan? WTTS as a sentimental spring track, and CGH as a great summer track. Maybe. I'm just loving both songs now -- you will get to enjoy both in just a few days! But .. but isn't it giving people instruction how to get to the link to download is kind of the same thing to giving the copy of the download? It's direct and indirect. If you don't want to be held responsible, you do not give the instruction on how to get it. JMHO. It will be out within then days. Why can we wait?  |
|
lydia
Member
Posts: 74
Location:
|
Post by lydia on Mar 20, 2016 21:50:43 GMT -5
It's not okay if it's a hacked version from WBR. First things first, it's NOT a hacked version. As long as the file is in the source code of a publicly available website, it's public. Not hacked. Completely public. Yea they hid it deep in the source code, so that no one would find it, but it's still public. Secondly, I was wrong to post the links on the Atop thread just now, because that was SHARING. That's why, now, for anyone who is dying to listen to the song, can listen to it for themselves by trying to find it on the public site. ETA: Hacking implies "unauthorised access" to data in a system or computer. There was no form of authorisation that I had to get through in order to listen to the song. Please use your words right.I suggest you review your post: "hidden in the source code so no one would find it". The intent is that no one hear the song until the release date. There was no assumption that someone would spend time trying to figure out how to get around their safeguards. You can try to finesse the language describing your behavior, but it is still wrong. If you disagree, I suggest you contact WBR, tell them what you've done, and ask them whether they are okay with it. I'm betting they won't be pleased. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2016 21:50:45 GMT -5
No, because that would be a recording of the official track. However, a fan recording the song on their phone at a loud festival with a bunch audience noise distorting the actual music is not the same. It's not ideal but musicians EXPECT, in 2016, that if they play their music at a festival, especially DJs, people will be recording the experience. That's not a leak. Can we stop with this discussion already? This is a leak, because Warner put the damn files up on a public site. Is it wrong to share a leak? The answer to that question is the same as the answer to this: is it wrong to share a publicly available link? The way I look at this, if you are able to get your hands on smth exclusive legally (I did), great for you. But if you feel like not sharing it is the right thing to do, then don't share it. That's why I'm not sharing it anymore. Also, I shared those bloody tracks for those who want to enjoy it. And Warner took down the links. Now those who want to listen to it can go get it for themselves. This is a pointless discussion. Damn girl. Chill. I was answering her question. |
|
|
|
Post by adamme on Mar 20, 2016 21:53:00 GMT -5
Disclaimer: I'm not going to PM anyone the songs, I don't want to be held responsible for anything. If you really really really really desire to hear the track and cannot wait a few more days for the song's release, you can still access them on Warner's site through a process that some may find tedious. If you're up for the challenge, instructions are on the Members Only > DL Links thread. But please, don't PM me asking me for the links. And if you get the song, please don't share it with anyone, just share your impressions of it.My impressions of it? It's a very, very chill house track. Adam starts singing in a very low, "chill" voice. Not heavy EDM. I LOVE the chorus! Adam's singing melody during the chorus is beautiful. Instrumental break we've all heard in those live snippets, it's a earworm! This song, however, doesn't show off Adam's range. He has probably only 1 high note in this song. But this song, I can already imagine, has the potential do well on Pop radio! Great melody, great instrumental break! Now that I think of it... Is this WBR's plan? WTTS as a sentimental spring track, and CGH as a great summer track. Maybe. I'm just loving both songs now -- you will get to enjoy both in just a few days! Cheers. But why do ppl fixate on his range in songs? Onlyone high note. So.what lol. He doesn't need to sing high notes in his songs. Yeah. i don't understand either. Adam said it in interview that he is not going to do high notes often this time around. Once and a while maybe. |
|
|
|
Post by AnnAdoresAdam on Mar 20, 2016 21:56:21 GMT -5
Thanks Ghost, you're a star. Really like the song which I didn't expect because the short Snapchat snippet we heard wasn't to my taste but there's much more of Adam singing than I'd anticipated. I feared it might be just a few lines of him singing and the remainder the kind of beat that you really need to be high on something to appreciate!
At just over 4 mins 20 secs it seems a bit long for a radio single so maybe there'll be a shorter version. Adam sounds great. So exciting to think of him having TWO singles out at the same time. World domination beckons!
|
|
oracle
Member
Posts: 583
Location:
|
Post by oracle on Mar 20, 2016 21:56:33 GMT -5
I wouldn't stress about the ethical dilemma because unless ghost posted it at another site, it's already out there.
|
|
