|
Post by csquared on Apr 4, 2015 14:24:13 GMT -5
Just want to add my experience to the recent problems with seeing embedded tweets etc. I use my iPad (always logged in to ATOP)and desktop (Windows 7, Firefox, using private browsing and often not logged in). Following your advice, i recently reset(?) Firefox and got rid of most of its add-ons. On both the iPad and the desktop I usually get blank posts when pi and 4EverAdam post embedded tweets. On the iPad, if I refresh the page they will usually (or almost always) appear, or if I go back to a previous page where the blank post was (which I guess is essentially a refresh). On the desktop, if I log in and then refresh the page, I can then see their posts. Because this only seems to happen with posts from a few people, I wonder if the "problem" originates at their end, something with how the posts are formatted or something?? Another issue is the slow loading of graphics-heavy pages on the iPad. Usually I don't have too much trouble, but yesterday there was one page (page 4 or 5?) that had a lot of instagrams, tweets, and videos, and also I noticed that 4EverAdam has an avi that consists of a gif of four photos (I swear I'm not trying to pick on her!). She had four or five posts on that page. I wonder if that particular gif is maybe too large and is affecting the page loading speed for some of us? mszue mentioned on the page after that that she was having problems with slow loading on her iPad too. Just wanted to throw these things out there for the troubleshooting record if these things persist. Hey, at least that instagram not recognized box thingy has gone away! 
|
|
|
Post by spiffysmile on Apr 15, 2015 4:54:41 GMT -5
Just an FYI to add to our bank of knowledge:
I just got an updates for windows 7 and now I can't see pi's posts. as other members have experienced, pi's posts are totally blank to me.
|
|
Jablea
Member
 
Posts: 4,983
Location:
|
Post by Jablea on Apr 15, 2015 8:38:59 GMT -5
Looking at two of Pi's posts that were next to each other and pasting the BB code. Appears to be a formatting issue to me in how the timestamp is working since it's not quoting correctly either. Visible [quote source="/post/606006/thread" timestamp="1429083260" author="@pi"]@marisa_965 WE HAVE VIDEO!!! OUR BIGGEST TV CHANNEL ANNOUNCES THAT QUEEN + ADAM LAMBERT WILL BE ON ROCK IN RIO. http://t.co/r6bbwrbBYq
http://globotv.globo.com/rede-globo/jornal-nacional/t/edicoes/v/queen-tocara-no-rock-in-rio-2015/3996500/[/quote] Not Visible - Note how the source is AFTER " pi" instead of before almost everything [quote timestamp="1429082693" author="@pi" source="/post/606005/thread"][twitter url="https://twitter.com/shoshannastone/status/588214268908142593"][/quote] Here is a twitter as shown by floralia with timestamp in right place and it's working fine. [quote source="/post/606050/thread" timestamp="1429104362" author="@floralia"][twitter url="https://twitter.com/officialcharts/status/588331931961585664"][/quote]
|
|
|
Post by Q3 on Apr 15, 2015 10:43:15 GMT -5
Looking at two of Pi's posts that were next to each other and pasting the BB code. Appears to be a formatting issue to me in how the timestamp is working since it's not quoting correctly either. Visible [quote source="/post/606006/thread" timestamp="1429083260" author="@pi"]@marisa_965 WE HAVE VIDEO!!! OUR BIGGEST TV CHANNEL ANNOUNCES THAT QUEEN + ADAM LAMBERT WILL BE ON ROCK IN RIO. http://t.co/r6bbwrbBYq
http://globotv.globo.com/rede-globo/jornal-nacional/t/edicoes/v/queen-tocara-no-rock-in-rio-2015/3996500/[/quote] Not Visible - Note how the source is AFTER " pi" instead of before almost everything [quote timestamp="1429082693" author="@pi" source="/post/606005/thread"][twitter url="https://twitter.com/shoshannastone/status/588214268908142593"][/quote] Here is a twitter as shown by floralia with timestamp in right place and it's working fine. [quote source="/post/606050/thread" timestamp="1429104362" author="@floralia"][twitter url="https://twitter.com/officialcharts/status/588331931961585664"][/quote] Thanks for posting this. It is not how it looks to me and with this info I can solve pi problem!
|
|