|
|
Post by rihannsu on May 17, 2012 23:13:04 GMT -5
It has moved some. But the album may be seeing more of a bump just we can't tell because the only thing in front of it is another AI product which would also be seeing a bump. He did pass Tenacious D again though so definitely an increase.
NCOE
Pop
80. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertThursday, May 17, 2012 7:02 AM
80. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertThursday, May 17, 2012 12:15 PM
79. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertThursday, May 17, 2012 7:00 PM
51. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertThursday, May 17, 2012 12:00 AM
Overall
211. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertThursday, May 17, 2012 7:02 AM
209. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertThursday, May 17, 2012 12:15 PM
217. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertThursday, May 17, 2012 7:00 PM
148. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertThursday, May 17, 2012 12:00 AM
ETA - Corrected post for copy/paste day error
|
|
|
|
Post by maddie509 on May 17, 2012 23:23:29 GMT -5
It has moved some. But the album may be seeing more of a bump just we can't tell because the only thing in front of it is another AI product which would also be seeing a bump. He did pass Tenacious D again though so definitely an increase. NCOE Pop 80. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertThursday, May 17, 2012 7:02 AM 80. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertWednesday, May 17, 2012 12:15 PM 79. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertWednesday, May 17, 2012 7:00 PM 51. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertWednesday, May 17, 2012 12:00 AM Overall 211. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertThursday, May 17, 2012 7:02 AM 209. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertWednesday, May 17, 2012 12:15 PM 217. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertWednesday, May 17, 2012 7:00 PM 148. Never Close Our Eyes - Adam LambertWednesday, May 17, 2012 12:00 AM
It's Adam's fault, 'cuz he created such a fabulous album that a song or two ain't gonna be satisfying, peeps will want the whole thing! |
|
|
|
Post by rabbitrabbit on May 18, 2012 2:03:28 GMT -5
midnight PST
overall
134 NCOE
pop
49 NCOE
|
|
|
|
Post by crazyoldgal on May 18, 2012 6:10:19 GMT -5
midnight PST overall 134 NCOE pop 49 NCOE NEEDED TO BE in at least Top 20 134 is not good. David Cooks single reached the 50's what is going on?????? possibly buying the whole album? I did a quick check and it seems Donna Summer is #1 with other albums in the top 20 position. Will he lose out to SOmmer in hitting tte #1 position??? number people pls read the tea leaves for me and give me an explanation, How will this affect his spins for Top 40? pd's noticing this slump? |
|
|
|
Post by fifthhousesun on May 18, 2012 7:16:44 GMT -5
So, should we be seeing more iTunes movement for NCOE? Is it too soon? Maybe people are buying the album (which is great) but I hope the single can at least crack the top 100. The product placement aspect of the huge, giant Trespassing album cover at the end of Adam's performance on Idol was fantastic. And certainly could have helped sell many an album. And if Idol viewers went to iTunes, and the Adam Lambert banner was jumping out at the top of the page, an album sale is very likely. Especially if they sampled. Or had even read a review or two and now saw, yes, this is great. However, a lot of people, who don't obsessively follow Adam's career - millions last night were hearing NCOE for the first time - may have thought the big sign meant Trespassing was also the name of the song, and bought it. Combined with the Neptunes/Pharrell fan support that may have helped the Trespassing single be higher in the charts, non-obsessed people just clicked. Also, didn't NCOE rise something like 70 places last night? Was it even in the Top 200? It went from 175 to now 131 during my noticing. 44 places is a bounce. Especially, considering tributes to Ms. Summer purchases. |
|
rama
Member
Posts: 1,132
Location:
|
Post by rama on May 18, 2012 7:35:16 GMT -5
I agree that people watching Idol would have checked out Trespassing since it was displayed prominently rather than the single. People would have had to search itunes for NCOE but Trespassing is right there easy to find. Also, NCOE can't possibly be compared to a song like Cook's that was just released with no album.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2012 7:37:20 GMT -5
So, should we be seeing more iTunes movement for NCOE? Is it too soon? Maybe people are buying the album (which is great) but I hope the single can at least crack the top 100. And if Idol viewers went to iTunes, and the Adam Lambert banner was jumping out at the top of the page, an album sale is very likely. Especially if they sampled. Or had even read a review or two and now saw, yes, this is great. However, a lot of people, who don't obsessively follow Adam's career - millions last night were hearing NCOE for the first time - may have thought the big sign meant Trespassing was also the name of the song, and bought it. Combined with the Neptunes/Pharrell fan support that may have helped the Trespassing single be higher in the charts, non-obsessed people just clicked. Also, didn't NCOE rise something like 70 places last night? Was it even in the Top 200? It went from 175 to now 131 during my noticing. 44 places is a bounce. Especially, considering tributes to Ms. Summer purchases. Yes - I was cheering that big "Trespassing" behind him! |
|
JazzRocks
Member
The Crazy Train is Ready to Roll!
Posts: 4,280
Location:
|
Post by JazzRocks on May 18, 2012 7:58:21 GMT -5
I agree that people watching Idol would have checked out Trespassing since it was displayed prominently rather than the single. People would have had to search itunes for NCOE but Trespassing is right there easy to find. Also, NCOE can't possibly be compared to a song like Cook's that was just released with no album.
No wank here - just curious. I did expect NCOE to jump much higher given Cook's leap (went as high as #46 I think) after his performance. Not sure what your last sentence means. Why can't it be compared? Do you mean because ppl would buy the album & not just the single?
I think even KA's single went higher after his performance but he too had no album at that point. So perhaps it was confusing to ppl and I think you made a good point about the prominent Trespassing display.
Hey - RCA was quoted as saying they want a #1 album and it will be that or very close. So that's the focus right now I'm sure. |
|
rama
Member
Posts: 1,132
Location:
|
Post by rama on May 18, 2012 8:10:01 GMT -5
I agree that people watching Idol would have checked out Trespassing since it was displayed prominently rather than the single. People would have had to search itunes for NCOE but Trespassing is right there easy to find. Also, NCOE can't possibly be compared to a song like Cook's that was just released with no album.
No wank here - just curious. I did expect NCOE to jump much higher given Cook's leap (went as high as #46 I think) after his performance. Not sure what your last sentence means. Why can't it be compared? Do you mean because ppl would buy the album & not just the single?
I think even KA's single went higher after his performance but he too had no album at that point. So perhaps it was confusing to ppl and I think you made a good point about the prominent Trespassing display.
Hey - RCA was quoted as saying they want a #1 album and it will be that or very close. So that's the focus right now I'm sure.What I mean by it can't be compared is that fans already bought NCOE when it first was released. This performance was not on NCOE's debut week. Even with no fanfare it went higher on it's debut than Cook's with an Idol performance for its debut. Wasn't Kris's TVOL also performed on its debut week. I agree that getting Trespassing to #1 seems to be the priority for RCA. |
|
JazzRocks
Member
The Crazy Train is Ready to Roll!
Posts: 4,280
Location:
|
Post by JazzRocks on May 18, 2012 8:39:41 GMT -5
I understand & I agree. All fans had already bought NCOE so any sales would be newbies. Also - I think the "free" DL of NCOE with the album DL cut into single sales initially.
|
|
