|
|
Post by isitjustme on May 13, 2012 14:51:45 GMT -5
Just another comment about the font issues discussed earlier ... I did some research on this earlier for a newsletter I produce that switched from print to digital. Although the prevailing preference for reading print material is a serif font (such as Times), on a computer screen sans serif fonts are MUCH easier to read, and Verdana seems to be a popular choice. So I hate to say this, Q3 and a few others, but I find your posts in a serif font to be particularly difficult to read, especially in the smallish default type size. Sorry! :(
My posts should not be "smallish". But is it hard to read? For me it is. And I'm afraid I also agree with WingsofButterflies and others that are doing a whole lot of scrolling today. I'm sorry. |
|
shimayo
Member
Posts: 102
Location:
|
Post by shimayo on May 13, 2012 14:52:40 GMT -5
I didn't know today was Mother's Day , ours is still on june. Malagasy people call "mom" every person who is kind to us, so I wish all Atopians happy Mother's Day! Thank to Q3 for the cool new toys, sure I'll try them one day, but first I will begin by learning how to quote, baby steps in computer skills  |
|
lyris
Member
Posts: 129
Location:
|
Post by lyris on May 13, 2012 14:56:15 GMT -5
My posts should not be "smallish". But is it hard to read? I would not say hard. It does however require more active attention/processing to read it. It takes me probably twice as long to read what you wrote in that font than it would take me to read the same information in the font we had before. This also means it makes it harder for me to scan a page and it takes me longer to read the posts. I hope that made sense, as I am not sure I am doing a good job at explaining what I mean. I am curious about how this will play out in the long run, but I am already starting to find myself more likely to skip posts that are in a font that are harder to read in any form. It is too early to tell if I will skip more and more posts or get more used to it and stop doing it. |
|
|
|
Post by smokeyvera on May 13, 2012 14:56:57 GMT -5
Keisha Renee' @keisharenee
Finally boarding.
Hard color to read.
So then takeoff is 4:30 EST. Then he probably won't get to his hotel room until 11:00pm - that sucks - no dinner included. Gonna be tough tomorrow am |
|
hoopla1
Member
Posts: 1,499
Location:
|
Post by hoopla1 on May 13, 2012 14:59:48 GMT -5
Jeesh, I leave for a few days and come back to CHANGES... NEW FONTS!! AND NEW COLORS!! and all sorts of thingses I'll have to play with later!! Q3, you've outdone yourself, girl!  I am trying to catch up as best I can--will take a while--but for right now, OT question... Does anyone here (or HAS anyone here) ever used an Android phone? If so, could you PM me with the pros/cons? I want to upgrade and found one on sale, but if it's a pain to use for some reason, I don't want it. HELP, please? And sorry to put this in main thread, but I need to decide by tomorrow! BACK TO ADAM: HOW ABOUT ALL THESE 4/5 REVIEWS???!!! I'M DOIN' MY HAPPY DANCE WHILE LISTENING TO THE STREAM! IT'S HAPPENING FOLKS! THE STORM IS HERE! ;D  |
|
scorpio
Member
Posts: 814
Location:
|
Post by scorpio on May 13, 2012 15:00:46 GMT -5
I don't understand what is going on with the fonts and colors. I'm seeing everything just fine.. Q3, your posts seem totally normal to me! Others with colors and different fonts seem totally normal too and not hard to read, not fuzzy etc? Why such a difference in what different people are seeing????
|
|
|
|
Post by ojosazules on May 13, 2012 15:01:00 GMT -5
Do any of the Finns here listen to Radio Aalto? I usually don't but I was really pleased to hear Adam's Mad World on their Acoustic Sunday this morning. And it was probably also them playing Sleepwalker another night when I was flipping through radio channels in car. Sometimes it really feels I'm living in Bertland but absolutely no complaining  |
|
|
|
Post by leenaseyez on May 13, 2012 15:01:02 GMT -5
Just another comment about the font issues discussed earlier ... I did some research on this earlier for a newsletter I produce that switched from print to digital. Although the prevailing preference for reading print material is a serif font (such as Times), on a computer screen sans serif fonts are MUCH easier to read, and Verdana seems to be a popular choice. So I hate to say this, Q3 and a few others, but I find your posts in a serif font to be particularly difficult to read, especially in the smallish default type size. Sorry! :(
My posts should not be "smallish". But is it hard to read? : I don't find your posts hard to read at all, nor smallish. Some others yes, some of them very challenging. But love these new features and think we learn soon what is adding value and what is making it worse . |
|
QueeenAl
Member
Fell so hard for this man, will never get up.
Posts: 2,179
Location:
|
Post by QueeenAl on May 13, 2012 15:01:18 GMT -5
Just another comment about the font issues discussed earlier ... I did some research on this earlier for a newsletter I produce that switched from print to digital. Although the prevailing preference for reading print material is a serif font (such as Times), on a computer screen sans serif fonts are MUCH easier to read, and Verdana seems to be a popular choice. So I hate to say this, Q3 and a few others, but I find your posts in a serif font to be particularly difficult to read, especially in the smallish default type size. Sorry! :( same here! I love individual expression, but if the reader has trouble with it, what's the addon for the sender? Pls people stick with simple non-serif fonts for regular posts!!!!! [glow=red,2,300]
Anything else for parties and flailing is welcome from QueeenAl!!![/glow] |
|
|
|
Post by adamme on May 13, 2012 15:01:50 GMT -5
James Shotwell @utgjames Editor/Founder - Under The Gun Review (@utgreview), Co-Owner - Antique Records (@antiquerecords), professional cinephile. I love entertainment. Michigan/Boston · underthegunreview.netJames Shotwell @utgjames In over 5 years of entertainment writing I have never encountered a digital street team as organized and self-driven as Adam Lambert's fans.He's the editor of this review www.underthegunreview.net/2012/05/12/review-adam-lambert-trespassing/
Do we really an organized fan base as Adam's International fan bases? I'm not sure but I think we just love it when these music critics actually do their job and trying to review Adam's music objectively. And when it's good and or fair we love to spread the words and thank them off course. |
|
