|
Post by adamrocks on Nov 20, 2013 22:05:18 GMT -5
Jocie∞☯ @trueglambert3 2h Omggggg look what this guy said on omegle when he saw my Adam poster in the back!!! pic.twitter.com/RegLfT9hP6
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2013 22:07:04 GMT -5
What is it about Adam's version of as song that makes me love it more than other versions? The first thing that hits me is the tone of his voice. It is bright, clear, and ringing, but with a fullness, roundness, and depth, too. Other singers have good voices, but most of the pop and rock singers I hear don't have that resonance. Their voices sound flat (not in pitch, but in tone) or dull in comparison. I don't set out to compare, really. But, when I hear another singer and then hear Adam, the richness of his tone is strikingly obvious to me. Have you you seen the TV ads for Claritin allergy meds? They show someone in a pretty outdoor setting talking and it looks fine. Then, when they talk about Claritin, the special effect is like taking a slightly gauzy film off the camera lens and everything just pops with color and crispness. Adam's voice is like that. Or like someone here once said: like other voices are two dimensional and Adam's is in 3D. The second thing about Adam's performances is the intensity of the emotions in the song. The words and phrases mean something. The song tells a story. After listening to Adam, when I hear others there is a kind of flatness in the interpretation. Maybe it is Adam's training in theater that causes him to consider how to approach the song so that it means something. Technically, Adam does things to bring that emotionalism to the song. Things like changing the tone, roughening it up or smoothing it out, singing it with a straight, piercing sound, or warming it up with vibrato. Or doing subtle little things with the rhythms and phrasing, speeding up a phrase, elongating it, holding a note a bit longer, or delaying the start of a note or phrase. Or, varying how he articulates words, spitting them out in a staccato style, or flowing one sound into another, but always producing the words intelligibly. His interpretations are full of life and masterful.
Most singers cannot do this because they do not have the technical ability to do so much with their voice and delivery. Just something as "simple" as being able to sing any note delicately and softly, in a normal volume, or with super power is beyond many singers. All the technical things that Adam is able to do with his voice are, individually, very subtle, while cumulatively, they result in us thinking "Wow, that sounds great! The best I have ever heard that song." This is not to take away anything from other singers who are also very good. I am not dissing anyone. I am just trying to explain why some of us hear a "one in a billion" voice when Adam sings.
|
|
ariana
Member
Posts: 44
Location:
|
Post by ariana on Nov 20, 2013 22:08:24 GMT -5
Nationalglampoon! thank you. it was great!
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on Nov 20, 2013 22:11:03 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2013 22:17:14 GMT -5
I have a new found respect for Gaga after hearing Marry the Night performed by Adam.
I watched that Ellen interview posted here where she talked about what she was going through at the time she wrote this song, that Marry the Night is about marrying our darkness, our pain, embrace it as part of who we are.
She obviously has had her hard times and has turned them into something creative and moving though her music and I respect her for that.
|
|
|
Post by jean1010 on Nov 20, 2013 22:23:58 GMT -5
I, too, enjoyed your MTN mash-up, Glampoon! What I'm not enjoying so much is the comparisons between Adam and Gaga. They are two diverse, incomparable artists. How would this fandom feel if an artist covered an Adam song and it was being said the other artist's version put Adam's in the dust? I believe very much in the old adage "If you can't say anything nice ...........,but in the privacy of Atop, which is a home for fans that love Adam more than any other artist, it's OK t say that you like his version of a song better than another artist. It doesn't mean you don't respect the other artist, it just means that you like our guy best of all.
|
|
FanOfTheMan
Member
Love Our Guy!
Posts: 4,205
Location:
|
Post by FanOfTheMan on Nov 20, 2013 22:30:48 GMT -5
What is it about Adam's version of as song that makes me love it more than other versions? The first thing that hits me is the tone of his voice. It is bright, clear, and ringing, but with a fullness, roundness, and depth, too. Other singers have good voices, but most of the pop and rock singers I hear don't have that resonance. Their voices sound flat (not in pitch, but in tone) or dull in comparison. I don't set out to compare, really. But, when I hear another singer and then hear Adam, the richness of his tone is strikingly obvious to me. Have you you seen the TV ads for Claritin allergy meds? They show someone in a pretty outdoor setting talking and it looks fine. Then, when they talk about Claritin, the special effect is like taking a slightly gauzy film off the camera lens and everything just pops with color and crispness. Adam's voice is like that. Or like someone here once said: like other voices are two dimensional and Adam's is in 3D. The second thing about Adam's performances is the intensity of the emotions in the song. The words and phrases mean something. The song tells a story. After listening to Adam, when I hear others there is a kind of flatness in the interpretation. Maybe it is Adam's training in theater that causes him to consider how to approach the song so that it means something. Technically, Adam does things to bring that emotionalism to the song. Things like changing the tone, roughening it up or smoothing it out, singing it with a straight, piercing sound, or warming it up with vibrato. Or doing subtle little things with the rhythms and phrasing, speeding up a phrase, elongating it, holding a note a bit longer, or delaying the start of a note or phrase. Or, varying how he articulates words, spitting them out in a staccato style, or flowing one sound into another, but always producing the words intelligibly. His interpretations are full of life and masterful.
Most singers cannot do this because they do not have the technical ability to do so much with their voice and delivery. Just something as "simple" as being able to sing any note delicately and softly, in a normal volume, or with super power is beyond many singers. All the technical things that Adam is able to do with his voice are, individually, very subtle, while cumulatively, they result in us thinking "Wow, that sounds great! The best I have ever heard that song." This is not to take away anything from other singers who are also very good. I am not dissing anyone. I am just trying to explain why some of us hear a "one in a billion" voice when Adam sings. cassie-
THANK YOU! Each time you share your professional insights on Adam's incredible talent, I understand a bit more why his voice moves me so deeply and why I love his performances so much. From the first time I heard his gorgeous voice I knew I was hearing something very unique. You are teaching me to appreciate his great talent and depth even more. He has been blessed with a very special gift that he is sharing with the world. How I love this Man.
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on Nov 20, 2013 22:32:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Q3 on Nov 20, 2013 22:35:03 GMT -5
Oh, hunter is now fully owned! No escaping when I start Once I'm in I own your heart There's no way you'll ring the alarm
|
|
|
Post by tinafea on Nov 20, 2013 22:37:39 GMT -5
Y'all can do what you would like but it seems like any worrying about #3 is really premature. We know nothing about a label and zip about his creative direction so at this point I plan to remain quite zen. I am not worrying at all. Just discussing. Was not directed at you, just a general comment You never worry upfront
|
|