Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2011 23:11:52 GMT -5
THE SPINDLESHAY,, Thank you for providing Joy's Theme Party!!! I just spent the best hour and half listening to it. I do believe I am coming around to remixes, by golly. No other words..but, WOW!
|
|
irish1139
Member
Enter your message here...
Posts: 1,872
Location:
|
Post by irish1139 on Mar 19, 2011 23:12:45 GMT -5
Holy sh*t. I must have missed a whole lot in my education. Are only master and doctoratal degree students allowed access to information like what you have just quoted. I am sure I would have remembered reading something like you described if it had been presented to me. Are only intellectuals suppose to be enlightened and the worker bees just plod along like herds of sheep. No wonder the people in this country are so stupid we have to have arguments and pass laws letting everyone know who is and who isn't equal. There must be a better way to raise human beings. I wish we were all on the same page.
|
|
|
Post by HoppersSkippersMiners on Mar 19, 2011 23:12:53 GMT -5
Damn, there are good conversations goin' on tonight!! Need a good glass of merlot so I can properly curl up and read all of mika's, midwifespal's, rhinnasu's, momtomany's, and all y'all's other stuff. :D
|
|
aloha
Member
Posts: 2,629
Location:
|
Post by aloha on Mar 19, 2011 23:15:32 GMT -5
Now, all that said, I love Leonard Cohen. Love Bruce Cockburn, Ferron, Antony and the Johnsons, Indigo Girls, Lou Reed. Love earnest, heartfelt, poetic. Love depth. I'm looking forward to seeing what Adam can do on that level ... Broken Open, I think, bodes well. Hey, I remember you said you serenaded your guests with Yeats, yes? You're my hero and I want to come to your house:) I hope there's a bee-loud glade. More poetry please!!! Are you on twitter? I ask because I follow Leonard Cohen Quotes and it often makes me smile. Indeed, I've never understood the need to box 'relevant music' into one genre. Doesn't art give voice to the range of human experience and vision. Sometimes that's arch and/or theatrical, sometimes it's a guy/girl with a guitar and a mic, or Placido Domingo or Iggy rolling around on broken glass. Do I really have to decide one is more authentic? As a member of the great audience, I think not. Still, for current (new) artists, it is a difficult time because so many trends are played out for the moment. Even the 'vocabulary' has become inadequate, as is regularly demonstrated. David Foster Wallace wrestled greatly with (for lack of better words) finding the heart in the postmodern (or post postmodern) world. He leaned towards some form of sincerity being the new rebellion. The last para of something he said/wrote reminded of the criticisms leveled at Adam - that' he's not a real rock star or (for some) a genuine artist b/c he's too polite, accessible, smooth (both in vocals and personality), sentimental, etc. I think one of the reviews or blogs even said something about his being too nice (or similar adjective) as a criticism.
This is the conclusion of one of Foster's musings on this topic:
"Real rebels, as far as I can see, risk disapproval. The old postmodern insurgents risked the gasp and squeal: shock, disgust, outrage, censorship, accusations of socialism, anarchism, nihilism. Today’s risks are different. The new rebels might be artists willing to risk the yawn, the rolled eyes, the cool smile, the nudged ribs, the parody of gifted ironists, the “Oh how banal.” To risk accusations of sentimentality, melodrama. Of overcredulity. Of softness. Of willingness to be suckered by a world of lurkers and starers who fear gaze and ridicule above imprisonment without law. Who knows."thisdrivesmostpeoplecrazy.com/2010/09/28/david-foster-wallace-on-irony/www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ft4YT80XgHg All right. Now here's a post I really do love, especially the bolded portion. One reason Adam confounds so many people is, I believe, because he inhabits a space that somehow incorporates both the hard edge and the soft emotional core. It is the very reason he is so difficult to pigeonhole. And he is unapologetic about his fuck you attitude AND his mama's boy desire to please.
|
|
|
Post by boicantspell on Mar 19, 2011 23:16:28 GMT -5
Why does this make me smile -- (the evil side of me came out!!!) 10.I Remember Me ~ Jennifer Hudson Release Date: March 22, 2011 11. Glam Nation Live ~ Adam Lambert Release Date: March 22, 2011 Adam is releasing a DVD and live CD of a 16 month old album's tour. J.Hud is releasing her "highly anticipated" sophomore album with a promo single (R&B Hit) and radio support -- and they are battling for #10 on Amazon. I have nothing against J.Hud but just loving this! Adam's DVD+CD is $6 more a unit and far lower cost. RCA and Adam will be smiling as they go to the bank. This probably insures that Adam gets Adam #3 even in the absolutely impossible case that Adam #2 doesn't sell. Longevity!!
I love this post so much I want to marry it!! Thank you, Q3!!! *squishes Q3 tight*
|
|
|
Post by midwifespal on Mar 19, 2011 23:16:32 GMT -5
"Gay is an extremely broad adjective that, as you say, includes anything and everything under the banner of being attracted to the same sex." That's not what I think. I think gay means one thing and one thing only - being sexually attracted to the same sex. Just like I think straight means one thing and one thing only - being sexually attracted to the opposite sex. Hooboy, now I feel like I've opened up a whole big kettle of worms that I didn't intend to, and I fear I've offended some people and I didn't intend to do that either. However, let me try to respond to this: You're right, of course, in saying that literally, all "gay" means is "being sexually attracted to the same sex." I'm not trying to argue with that, per se. However, I think that a whole lot of other cultural things are associated with the term, just like a whole lot of things are associated with the term "american" beyond just being born in the U.S. (not the best definition, but you know what I mean). That is why there can be whole departments in university dedicated to "queer studies," and perhaps "queer," in its rehabilitated form, would have been a better word for me to use, as it's less technical, but it has not been quite rehabilitated in day to day conversation, so I avoided it. "Gay," in its less technical sense, or “Queer,” in its academic sense, also refer to a whole bunch of other things—broader things having to do with community and art and culture and politics and gender and all sorts of subjects. Just like “Jewish,” an imperfect example I use less nervously because I am Jewish, can mean both very simply being raised in a specific religion, and can also mean all sorts cultural things that are extremely independent of that religion—woody allen’s movies, for example, are culturally extremely Jewish—even the ones in which Judiasm is never mentioned. I don’t think saying this horribly stereotypes jews, even though I’m sure there are many who don’t like Allen’s humor at all, and many non-jews who find him hilarious. I don’t know how to be clearer than this. Now: I want to see the dictionary where camp or campy in any way refers to someone being "gay." I didn't find that meaning in my Webster's dictionary. I think that is ludicrous. Ludicrous means amusing or laughable through obvious absurdity, incongruity or exaggeration. I didn't claim that "camp" referred to someone being gay--simply that it was artistically/historically/stylistically connected to gay culutre, and there are many dictionary examples of this, but I don't need to look further than the one Q3 quoted (from Webster's as it happens) in her post: Real definitions ----
Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language, 1976 edition, sense 6, [Slang, orig., homosexual jargon, Americanism] banality, mediocrity, artifice, ostentation, etc. so extreme as to amuse or have a perversely sophisticated appeal
The term goes back to early 20th century US. It became a more widely used in the US in the early 1970's and was very closely associated with gay artists, style and designers. Some websites state the term originated in 1955-1960 -- but the earliest known written reference i can find is 1909 and the expression may be older. Undoubtedly this use of the term originated in the US Gay Community in the New York area.
I think it's fairly established that "camp" has cultural and artistic and historical connections to the gay community. That doesn't mean in any way that one can or should equate "camp" with "gay" as that idiotic article headline did. Camp may reference gay culture, but that doesn't mean anything more than that. There are needless to say countless gay artists who aren't in the least camp, and are still "true" to their sexuality, whatever that means, which is, as Bridget points out, almost nothing. Similarly, as I've already said, there are many camp artists who aren't gay. Finally: "Gay is an extremely broad adjective that, as you say, includes anything and everything under the banner of being attracted to the same sex." That's not what I think. I think gay means one thing and one thing only - being sexually attracted to the same sex. Just like I think straight means one thing and one thing only - being sexually attracted to the opposite sex. WOW - I'm gay! And, in the strictest form of the "word" - you are correct! We absolutely need to get away from what a lot of kids say these days - "That's so Gay" or "You are so Gay"! If those words had a positive connotation - it wouldn't be an issue! But, they don't - hence, we have organizations like The Trevor Project's "It Gets Better" campaign, & Cyndi Lauper's "Give A Damn" & "True Colors Tour" Thanks for posting! I of course completely agree with this, and think the "that's so gay" insult is incredibly offensive and also pretty much meaningless, it is so corrupted and stupid. But I still think that the gay community, and in cultural terms there is a gay community, endlessly mixed and complex and fuzzy at its edges, like any community--I think the gay community has produced some fantastic artistic and cultural trends throughout history, which it deserves specific credit for, and it would be a pity to wash those contributions away by painting the whole world with one boring blah brush in an effort to avoid stereotyping. One of the wonderful things about this world is that different cultures and communities and micro-cultures and micro-communities produce different kinds of art. And I want to be clear--I am not trying to do anything but praise Adam to high heaven for his originality, and his savvy, and his humor, and his cultural sophistication, etc. etc. And I'm certainly not trying to box him in--any Adam is a wonderful, genuine Adam as far as I'm concerned. I love that he is many many things at once. I just happen to think that his campness is related, in some cultural, artistic sense to his gayness. But that is certainly not a bad thing--it is something that embraces the endless diversity within the community.
|
|
|
Post by glamnana on Mar 19, 2011 23:19:38 GMT -5
momtomany--- May the joy and inspiration you bring to others come back to you, and through you to little Penelope.
|
|
|
Post by Sunflower on Mar 19, 2011 23:26:23 GMT -5
Holy sh*t. I must have missed a whole lot in my education. Are only master and doctoratal degree students allowed access to information like what you have just quoted. I am sure I would have remembered reading something like you described if it had been presented to me. Are only intellectuals suppose to be enlightened and the worker bees just plod along like herds of sheep. No wonder the people in this country are so stupid we have to have arguments and pass laws letting everyone know who is and who isn't equal. There must be a better way to raise human beings. I wish we were all on the same page. That would be very boring! I really enjoy these discussions and I learn a lot from my fellow posters. I don't have master's degree and English isn't even my first language. I wouldn't be able to write a post like rihannasu's or midwifepal's but I love pondering about this stuff. Sometimes, I am only here for the silly stuff. But it's all supposed to be fun.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2011 23:35:43 GMT -5
I'm definitely not offended, MWP. (When I get offended, I pout and embarrass myself. You'd notice.)
When I read "gay community," though, I can't help but think of a comment Adam made in his RS interview that made me laugh out loud:
“Do we [gay men] have anything in common besides the fact that we like dick? Why can’t we just talk about a human community?”
(Practically-speaking, I try to use the words "gay"or "homosexual" to mean only one thing - and, interestingly, I've read stuff by people about why they prefer the word "homosexual" to the word "gay" for reasons related to this discussion - I should make clear that I do NOT think actual people should ever ever be or feel pinned down by words labelling sexuality. Unless, I guess, they want to be.)
|
|
mariep
Member
I prepare. I create. I love.
Posts: 1,073
Location:
|
Post by mariep on Mar 19, 2011 23:36:37 GMT -5
Goodnight everyone. Really interesting, informative, entertaining and enlightening discussions going on here tonight. I sometimes wish Adam could join us in these discussions. As great as they are among us, his input would surely add a dimension to them I can only glimpse. As I said to susiefierce on twitter tonight, there's always an "oh yeah" effect in the aftermath of his words and actions. He is the true inspiration for all that we say here and I thank him for giving us something wonderful to discuss everyday.
|
|