|
Post by lambo on Jul 4, 2012 17:23:32 GMT -5
No he was a baritone. Higher perhaps than some but a baritone. We'll have to agree to disagree darling. An angelic lower tenor to me! ;D I don't see anything wrong with the ad-libs and wails, those are Adam's style and it's Queen + Adam Lambert, Adam's take on Queen, putting his own stamp on it, yadda yadda
|
|
|
Post by houselady on Jul 4, 2012 17:24:52 GMT -5
Amazing that Adam or Brian didn't trip. Watch them running around the 3 minute mark.
|
|
|
Post by bridgeymah on Jul 4, 2012 17:33:06 GMT -5
Amazing that Adam or Brian didn't trip. Watch them running around the 3 minute mark. I liked the Kiev entrance at that point better ;D ;D (sucker for a back=bend) but that was pretty good.
|
|
|
Post by houselady on Jul 4, 2012 17:35:51 GMT -5
Brianmay.com news brianmay.com/queen/queennews/queennewsjul12a.html#08**Wed 04 Jul 12** POLAND TODAY WroclawBrian May and Roger Taylor arrived Poland today and gave a press conference at the airport on landing in Wroclaw at approx 2.45PM -with a whole army of Press and media in attendance. PLUS links to Moscow performances.
|
|
|
Post by adamme on Jul 4, 2012 17:36:28 GMT -5
I will probably have to change my name and go into hiding after this post. If you never see another post from me on ATop you can surmise that I was banned permanently. But, here goes: I don't think that Adam's voice is particularly well suited for hard rock.I think he is effective singing with Queen because he has the range for the songs, and he eats up the stage. His showmanship is something very rare these days, but is the essence of Queen as rock opera. The typical voice I hear in hard rock is very chesty. Gruff. And pretty much flat in terms of resonance. There is the basic note, but it lacks the sub-harmonics that add richness and depth. How to explain? When you sing something in the shower, your voice bounces off the smooth surfaces and creates a fuller, richer sound, almost an echo. When you sing the same phrase outside in the open, there is nothing to bounce off, and it sounds dull. The rock singer may be able to belt things out very loudly and with power, but, usually without ring. Adam's voice has all kinds of resonance and sub-harmonics. It's like he is always singing in the shower, even without a mic. The notes bounce around his body, his chest cavity and his head cavities. He has this "ping" or ring to his voice. Even though he can sing with great power on those belted high notes, through much of his range, his voice has a light, almost lilting quality. He can darken it up some, he can add grit, but it's still a light tenor voice. When he really powers it up, he magnifies the resonance even more, and he also uses techniques to sharpen the consonants and vowels in the words to give it bite. It gives the illusion of a rock vocal, but, sound frequency wise, it's not. Adam's voice "fits" better for musical theater, arts songs, and light opera. (Come To Me, Bend to Me, and My Conviction style). There his type of voice is rare and coveted. However, Adam does not want to sing light opera. He wants to sing rock and pop. And, he does it very well, despite not having a voice made to fit that genre. He MAKES his voice fit the genre. Could he actually sing like the typical rocker dude? Possibly. If he had never had classical vocal training, probably to an extent -- if he was singing incorrectly for his body and voice physiology. It would damage his voice over time, like that type of singing without classical technique has damaged other great rock voices. But, I don't think Adam will willingly abandon his technique and training and sing in a style that is harmful on the vocal cords. Even if he wants to be a rock god. The instrument he has is too precious to risk. And, singing with that resonance and ring in your body FEELS so good, from head to.... well, you have seen evidence of where it feels REALLY good. I love the SHOW he puts on with Queen. It is such a total performance. It looks effortless, but, it is very hard work. I have fingers and toes crossed he will perform with them in the US, somewhere relatively close to me. All this is just my opinion based on what I know about the voice. YMMV. cassie, don't worry about your comment.. LOL.. here's one comment on Q-forum about Freddie's voice which is why Adam's FIT perfectly with Queen catalogue Mithril wrote: Queen was always an outlier for rock and roll. Freddie could do gritty, but he had a pure, clean, rich tone that was used far more often. Roy Orbison is another with such a voice. There is a place for those voices, and that, in part, is why AL is a good fit with Queen imo.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2012 17:42:41 GMT -5
I will probably have to change my name and go into hiding after this post. If you never see another post from me on ATop you can surmise that I was banned permanently. But, here goes: I don't think that Adam's voice is particularly well suited for hard rock.I think he is effective singing with Queen because he has the range for the songs, and he eats up the stage. His showmanship is something very rare these days, but is the essence of Queen as rock opera. The typical voice I hear in hard rock is very chesty. Gruff. And pretty much flat in terms of resonance. There is the basic note, but it lacks the sub-harmonics that add richness and depth. How to explain? When you sing something in the shower, your voice bounces off the smooth surfaces and creates a fuller, richer sound, almost an echo. When you sing the same phrase outside in the open, there is nothing to bounce off, and it sounds dull. The rock singer may be able to belt things out very loudly and with power, but, usually without ring. Adam's voice has all kinds of resonance and sub-harmonics. It's like he is always singing in the shower, even without a mic. The notes bounce around his body, his chest cavity and his head cavities. He has this "ping" or ring to his voice. Even though he can sing with great power on those belted high notes, through much of his range, his voice has a light, almost lilting quality. He can darken it up some, he can add grit, but it's still a light tenor voice. When he really powers it up, he magnifies the resonance even more, and he also uses techniques to sharpen the consonants and vowels in the words to give it bite. It gives the illusion of a rock vocal, but, sound frequency wise, it's not. Adam's voice "fits" better for musical theater, arts songs, and light opera. (Come To Me, Bend to Me, and My Conviction style). There his type of voice is rare and coveted. However, Adam does not want to sing light opera. He wants to sing rock and pop. And, he does it very well, despite not having a voice made to fit that genre. He MAKES his voice fit the genre. Could he actually sing like the typical rocker dude? Possibly. If he had never had classical vocal training, probably to an extent -- if he was singing incorrectly for his body and voice physiology. It would damage his voice over time, like that type of singing without classical technique has damaged other great rock voices. But, I don't think Adam will willingly abandon his technique and training and sing in a style that is harmful on the vocal cords. Even if he wants to be a rock god. The instrument he has is too precious to risk. And, singing with that resonance and ring in your body FEELS so good, from head to.... well, you have seen evidence of where it feels REALLY good. I love the SHOW he puts on with Queen. It is such a total performance. It looks effortless, but, it is very hard work. I have fingers and toes crossed he will perform with them in the US, somewhere relatively close to me. All this is just my opinion based on what I know about the voice. YMMV. No, not hard rock although I think he holds his own. He's had too much training to let it go raw. That's not a bad thing.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2012 17:44:45 GMT -5
Done and Thank You. Know any magic to actually get the file to load on my I-Pod? when you're in itunes with your ipod connected, just drag the songs or videos from your music library onto your ipod and they will automatically copy. If you get a message that something won't play on your ipod, go to the Advanced menu and select "create ipod version." Thank you so much. So flippin' simple, right?! I thought it was some sort of proprietory thing with IPOD.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2012 17:48:17 GMT -5
Good post, cassie. But Queen really isn't true hard rock. If it was, I probably would not love them. It is way more melodic. They almost have their very own genre! Rock/Pop/Opera. Freddie did not have a hard rock voice either I think the term "rock voice" does not mean anything. Adam sings in a different style than Freddie -- and he sings in a way that no other pop-rock singer does. Nothing wrong with that. But no reason to expect someone who love Freddie or Plant or Perry to love Adam. What is different about Adam? I think that sometimes Adam's vocals are too complex for rock music -- for example, Bo Rhap from Kiev... For the most part in this song, Adam's vocals are perfect. But listen to him at 3:30-3:41 on this video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ax8P2KJaTMgFor me, both an Adam and a Queen fan, it would have been so much better without that extra stuff. Sometimes he can't help himself It's somewhat his signature though don't you think?
|
|
lifetraveler
Member
Yeah, that's right, bitch! I'm amazing @_life_traveler
Posts: 913
Location:
|
Post by lifetraveler on Jul 4, 2012 17:49:12 GMT -5
Put me in the category of "there's no point in comparing" Adam to Freddie. For me, TBH, it's kind of a moot point. Freddie was WAYYY before my time; I only know of him as a memory/from videos/from what people say. Adam is very much an artist of today and I love that. From the videos and everything, Freddie seems like a wonderful, amazing singer and entertainer. I am very happy that the history of music had him. Adam is no Freddie and I would NOT want him to be that! I like him because he is his own original artist, and a badass one, too. That being said, he has a great voice and a theatrical showmanship, which I can see some (including Brian and Roger, apparently ) see as a good fit for Queen. So to me it's a win-win. As part of a younger generation, I've been enjoying discovering some of Queen's music through Adam - I'm sure this was, in part, Brian and Roger's hope when they signed Adam on.
|
|
|
Post by satisfied on Jul 4, 2012 17:53:06 GMT -5
Does Brian May have any sons? Because judging from those sweet photos, he's found one in Adam for realz. On stage, ok but even in interviews, so damn pround. He has 3 children - 1 son (34 years old) and 2 daughters.
|
|