Kamar
Member
twitter : @kamarmezher96
Posts: 2,294
Location:
|
Post by Kamar on Oct 6, 2013 14:07:42 GMT -5
Glad and happy I made you guys laugh Good night !! *sigh* I BET YOU ALL KNOW WHAT I'M GUNNA DREAM ABOUT TONIGHT .
|
|
augenpoesie
Member
But try and see my heart!
Posts: 2,775
Location:
|
Post by augenpoesie on Oct 6, 2013 14:09:39 GMT -5
If we are going for singers and not for voices (which is in my opinion a BIG difference) I'd go for Peter Gabriel. His crispy way of singing grabs my heart and soul - everytime! When you look at this video you can clearly hear that Paula Cole has the far better voice, but I really get chills when Peter sings... And referring to the greatest female singers, K.D. Lang is absolutely amazing and I have to admit that I dearly love Mrs. Barbra Streisand. Noone comes close to this voice - noone!
|
|
murly
Member
Life's my light and liberty and I shine when I want to shine.
Posts: 2,576
Location:
|
Post by murly on Oct 6, 2013 14:09:58 GMT -5
I had an argument in the comments section of Huffington Post once over whether Adam had one of the greatest voices in pop music today. The person fighting with me maintained that a great voice was just a matter of whom you like, while I argued that there are measurable criteria for a great voice: range, control, good tone, and smooth transition in passaggio, (learned that last term from cassie), all of which Adam displays in spades. I think it's ridiculous to say that if you like Taylor Swift's voice better than you like Beverly Sills' voice, that means Taylor is a better singer. She just isn't. Period. You can hate opera with every fiber of your being, but Beverly Sills was a better singer than Taylor Swift.
However, I will also say that a technically great voice doesn't automatically make for a great performer. I love Willie Nelson. He doesn't have a technically great voice--it's reedy, and his range is limited, but when he sings "Blue Eyes Crying in the Rain," it fills me with emotion. While I'm not a fan of Bob Dylan, I can understand why people get something from his songs.
So I think we should differentiate between "great singer" and "great performer." A great singer has a great voice. A great performer can perform songs in a way that connects with the listener, because they make the listener feel or think or get up and dance like a maniac.
And aren't we smart, because Adam is both a great singer and a great performer.
|
|
|
Post by butterknife on Oct 6, 2013 14:28:49 GMT -5
Still thinking about what makes a great singer. I'm curious how y'all would answer the following questions? (There are no right or wrong answers.) 1. Does a great singer/performer have to have a great voice (in terms of technique, vocal production, etc.)? Looking at RS's top 10, which includes Bob Dylan, for some the answer is "no." What do you think? 2. Does a great singer/performer have to interpret a song with emotion that moves you? Do they have to impart meaning to the lyrics and phrasing as opposed to just sounding good or making you want to dance along? 3. Does a great singer/performer have to have a compelling stage presence/persona? Do they have to be "entertaining" or can they just immerse themselves in the music? 4. Does a great singer/performer have to be good looking, sexy, slim, young, stylish or any of the above? How important is visual appeal? 5. Do you have to like the genre or type of music they perform in order to think they are a great singer? 6. Do you have to know anything about their personality and off-stage behavior/life? Does that affect your appreciation of them as a singer/performer? 7. Does a great singer/performer need to compose their own music and/or play an instrument? I'd love to read your opinions, comments, and insights. Thanks. Bandwagoning your previous post. Now answering questions: 1. Yes, nearly a must. 2. Yes, a must. 3. No. 4. No, I can listen to ogres sing. 5. No. 6. No. 7. No.
|
|
Avari
Member
Twitter: @AvariOnline
Posts: 1,021
Location:
|
Post by Avari on Oct 6, 2013 14:31:27 GMT -5
instagram.com/p/fIbpeKDy59/elilieb What do I do when my video gets 200K views in one day? I go have fun. And there's no one better to do that with than this guy ok, I'm only on page 4, so I'm sure I'm not the first person to say this, but HOLY HELL LOOK AT THOSE SEXY SCULPTED ARMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WITH FRECKLES!!!!!!! OMFG. I am literally salivating. Oops, TMI, huh?
|
|
|
Post by adamrocks on Oct 6, 2013 14:34:40 GMT -5
I had an argument in the comments section of Huffington Post once over whether Adam had one of the greatest voices in pop music today. The person fighting with me maintained that a great voice was just a matter of whom you like, while I argued that there are measurable criteria for a great voice: range, control, good tone, and smooth transition in passaggio, (learned that last term from cassie), all of which Adam displays in spades. I think it's ridiculous to say that if you like Taylor Swift's voice better than you like Beverly Sills' voice, that means Taylor is a better singer. She just isn't. Period. You can hate opera with every fiber of your being, but Beverly Sills was a better singer than Taylor Swift. However, I will also say that a technically great voice doesn't automatically make for a great performer. I love Willie Nelson. He doesn't have a technically great voice--it's reedy, and his range is limited, but when he sings "Blue Eyes Crying in the Rain," it fills me with emotion. While I'm not a fan of Bob Dylan, I can understand why people get something from his songs. So I think we should differentiate between "great singer" and "great performer." A great singer has a great voice. A great performer can perform songs in a way that connects with the listener, because they make the listener feel or think or get up and dance like a maniac. And aren't we smart, because Adam is both a great singer and a great performer. Yes....Yes we are very smart and very lucky!!!!
|
|
|
Post by coo.coo.ca.choo on Oct 6, 2013 14:35:26 GMT -5
The Roller Coaster Series : A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS "Mama ....Just killed my fans ...Put a tank top on and then ...They saw my picture , now they're DED" TAKE IT IN , GUYS , TAKE IT ALL IN .......
You should tweet your lyrics to Adam -- he'd roar.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2013 14:38:42 GMT -5
I had an argument in the comments section of Huffington Post once over whether Adam had one of the greatest voices in pop music today. The person fighting with me maintained that a great voice was just a matter of whom you like, while I argued that there are measurable criteria for a great voice: range, control, good tone, and smooth transition in passaggio, (learned that last term from cassie), all of which Adam displays in spades. I think it's ridiculous to say that if you like Taylor Swift's voice better than you like Beverly Sills' voice, that means Taylor is a better singer. She just isn't. Period. You can hate opera with every fiber of your being, but Beverly Sills was a better singer than Taylor Swift. However, I will also say that a technically great voice doesn't automatically make for a great performer. I love Willie Nelson. He doesn't have a technically great voice--it's reedy, and his range is limited, but when he sings "Blue Eyes Crying in the Rain," it fills me with emotion. While I'm not a fan of Bob Dylan, I can understand why people get something from his songs. So I think we should differentiate between "great singer" and "great performer." A great singer has a great voice. A great performer can perform songs in a way that connects with the listener, because they make the listener feel or think or get up and dance like a maniac. And aren't we smart, because Adam is both a great singer and a great performer. Yes....Yes we are very smart and very lucky!!!!
Last two paragraphs from Murly - absofuckinglutely!!!
|
|
|
Post by nonchallance on Oct 6, 2013 14:42:39 GMT -5
Still thinking about what makes a great singer. I'm curious how y'all would answer the following questions? (There are no right or wrong answers.) 1. Does a great singer/performer have to have a great voice (in terms of technique, vocal production, etc.)? Looking at RS's top 10, which includes Bob Dylan, for some the answer is "no." What do you think? 2. Does a great singer/performer have to interpret a song with emotion that moves you? Do they have to impart meaning to the lyrics and phrasing as opposed to just sounding good or making you want to dance along? 3. Does a great singer/performer have to have a compelling stage presence/persona? Do they have to be "entertaining" or can they just immerse themselves in the music? 4. Does a great singer/performer have to be good looking, sexy, slim, young, stylish or any of the above? How important is visual appeal? 5. Do you have to like the genre or type of music they perform in order to think they are a great singer? 6. Do you have to know anything about their personality and off-stage behavior/life? Does that affect your appreciation of them as a singer/performer? 7. Does a great singer/performer need to compose their own music and/or play an instrument? I'd love to read your opinions, comments, and insights. Thanks. I'm not overanalyzing it. I simply like or don't like what I hear.
|
|
col
Member
Posts: 312
Location:
|
Post by col on Oct 6, 2013 14:45:43 GMT -5
Today's topic got me examining what my criteria were for a "great" singer. I cannot venture to say who is the second best singer until I define for myself what "best" means. We all have such different opinions and preferences. I found interesting stuff on the web where others have tried to explain it as well. At one site I found a paragraph about singing "high notes." It so reminded me of Adam and his responses to "how high can you sing?" He has said he doesn't know, doesn't want to know, doesn't care. He thinks being told what was his allegedly highest note limited him in the past. What is most important is "Does it sound good?" The singer/author of this article said: "Eradicate the illusion of ‘up & down’/‘high & low’. The single most detrimental term which is widely used in singing and voice teaching is the term ‘high note‘. This term creates the illusion in the singer’s mind that the note really is ’high’. If a note is ‘high’ you have to ‘reach it’. In other words, a singer has to go elsewhere than where they already are to sing the note. This is a complete and total illusion. There is no such thing as a 'high' note, use the term 'fast' note instead, because the vocal cords are simply vibrating faster."
I think this is often Adam's approach to the "high notes." For example, that glory note at the end of WWTLF is a D5. A full note higher than the benchmark for great tenors, the tenor high C. We all hold our collective breaths as he sustains that note. But, we may not notice that Adam hits the same note multiple times in CLTCL just minutes earlier. We raved about the rich, full low register in that song, but at the end, he throws away a series of D5s in runs and riffs. If you listen and watch, they really are "throw aways." He doesn't look or sound as if he is straining or reaching. He is not focused on hitting those notes as anything special. It's just part of the melodic line for him, like any other melodic line. Very few top notch, classical tenors can hit a full-voiced D5 like Adam. Those who do often have these strained, red faces. When I consider the vocalists I find most pleasing to listen to, and those I do not care for, this characteristic of singing light, free, clear and with no sound or appearance of tension or push is present in all my favorites. My complaint about many pop singers who others rave about is that their voices sound so tense they hurt to listen to. YMMV, IMO, etc. For me , this is what makes a fantastic singer, the ones that don't Limit themselves, the ones that do some unbelievable "throw away" notes without making something big out of it, because it fit in the song. But Adam is for me not only a fantstic sínger but also a believable good singer, he FEELS the song, he always seems to find someting in a song, in the lyrics, that speaks to him, that let him be creative.So for me, any song that Adam is singing, is something he wants to tell, some emotion he wants us to feel, some fun he wants us to have with him. There are a lot of famous and popular singers, some of them with incredible voices, some not(hehehe) but a shameful huge amount of them doesn't seem to feel the song and if they don't feel it, how should i feel what they are trying to bring over and make me buy. So for me, a singer is good if i FEEL him or her; if they write their own songs or not doesn't matter that much when i like what i hear, i never knew who wrote the songs for Tina Turner, which Queen member wrote which song, who wrote for Elvis, if Bowie wrote his songs alone, but they bring the songs to life with their singing.
|
|