|
Post by Daenerys on Dec 13, 2013 2:18:56 GMT -5
Adam is ambitious and has the fire in his belly to be successful. Does he want superstardom. No one knows. He could be happy just the way things are. He's been performing on stage and somewhat in the entertaining business since he was 10. I think it's in his blood. He may never get to supersatdom but I don't think he'll be like the other Idols on the "Where are they now? list neither. I find those other Idols somewhat less ambitious and lazy but maybe they are happy where they are in their careers. Who knows. In all fairness to DMG and Edge there is only so much they can do with regards to opportunities for Adam when you have an era that tank. They kept him on the radar enough for him to not totally disappear. When era 3 rolls around we will see what they are really capable of. I'm looking for more from Shoshanna when it comes to Adam getting exposure other than some obscure internet blogs. His exposure outside the internet is non existing. Q3: Finally, I expect Adam will strengthen/change his band for the next tour. But one thing I am absolutely sure of -- Adam will change his band when he wants to and no one will convince him to do it any sooner than that. And we know that when necessary, he is capable of making hard choices about his band.
Adam is going to do whatever he wants with his band. If he thinks they are the greatest band ever there's nothing we can do but his band sucks. John Mayer and Gaga just fired their managers and people around them. I think John's album went gold. Adam should be so lucky to have half their success but according to them their current era wasn't good enough. That is what pop stars do when they think things aren't going the way they think it should. It's all business. I think part of managements job is to make sure their artists have the best around them ex: hired help bandmates. I understand that budget plays a big role but I'm hoping with a new label if they see half the potential Adam fans see the budget will be there for the best. You have to put out money to make money.
Clearly you do not follow the print and TV media very closely. Adam's mentions in non-digital media for the past 90 days in the US and in Canada are more than Kelly Clarkson's. (I picked her because you mentioned her earlier.) There is no chance that Adam thinks his touring band is the greatest band ever but he likes working with them. And while they are not as good as Adam, his band does not "suck". John Meyer's album is not close to gold anywhere -- debuted at 144,000 -- much lower than expected. And they spent a ton on promotion. I do not follow him so cannot say why he parted way with his manager. Gaga's fired her manager, Troy Carter, and that appears to be more about Troy being involved in other time-consuming ventures -- his new label and technology investments -- and not related to sales or business performance. Not sure what either situation has to do with Adam. Artist management is not about who is in the band, it is about business development -- and in the current music business, that is about capturing the full value of an artist's commercial potential. 2014 will tell the story for DMG and Adam. That is when Adam gets control of the last critical piece of his business from 19 Entertainment -- merchandising -- and when he is free to cut a new label deal. Regarding Adam's touring band, they are fine for what he is doing now -- an occasional one-off concert. If he decided to replace Tommy, for example, he would not sell any more tickets -- so why do it? When he tours for A3, the touring band and other performers will be based on whatever the music is and whatever show Adam wants to present. And I am now spoiled because I have seen Adam with two top-level bands -- Queen and Chic -- in the past year. I follow print and media very, very closely. Everything is timed and calculated. Adam mentions in the past 90 days may be more than Kelly but Kelly's has the bigger impact and that is what counts. Repeated articles of the same thing over and over can be just as non eventful compared to one that actually matters in the right media which is why Kelly still sells and gets her own TV special. You have to separate what media actually matters and what doesn't. According to gaga fans he got fired because he wanted more pop and less art. She wasn't having it. Even if your theory is somewhat correct his focus wasn't on her which is why he got fired. Artist management is about a long term plan for their artists career. There are a whole lot of players, agents, PR but the management ties it all together. Adam gets final band decisions but management is there to tell you what works and what doesn't. When RCA told Daughtry to get rid of his first drummer Joey. Daughtry got rid of him. Straight from the drummers mouth. 19 management at the time had no problem. What do you mean if Adam decides to replace Tommy he would sell no more tickets? ETA: Tommy is a nobody. He was a nobody when he was hired and he still is. Fans are here for Adam and if Tommy gets replaced by a better guitarist, Tommy's fans who are only here for him will go with him. The next guitarist will pick up his own share of groupies. My issues isn't only with Tommy but the MD and drummer. Ashley is the only keeper for me.
|
|
|
Post by Daenerys on Dec 13, 2013 2:39:09 GMT -5
I've posted a lot today but I promise I'll go back into hiding. I wanted to just say some things on my mind. Adam is a throwback. If this was the 70s-80s he would have been a superstar by now. He's a theatrical, OTT and bigger than life performer(Freddie, Bowie). People just don't appreciate that kind of art anymore. The country is more conservative and rock, country are the music genre that America prefers. His image is rocker. Even when he glams it up he reminds me of the rockers back in the days. Radio no likey dancepop diva Adam. They want that only in the pop girls. Pop artist like Bruno and JT cross genres with RB mixed in that's why they are successful. I think there is a middle ground for him. Alt/ poprock is where he needs to be. Less production in his music. TSP was still too over produced. Adam said he has been listening to more Alt music. I hope he's inspired. I love the way discussions about A's career are so US centric (not). He has pretty decent followings in other markets and seems very interested in an international career. Yes US is biggest market but that doesn't negate international impact. For comparison Carrie Underwood came to Oz this year and couldn't sell out the same venue Adam easily sold out during GNT. Commercial Success in US is influential yes but doesn't automatically translate to other countries. Worth thinking about. Suspect Adam and management are. #justmythoughts I think Adam's International career is in better shape than is US. Adam had a hit song that's why he sold out in OZ during GNT. Carrie may not have sold out but she still went platinum 4 albums later.
|
|
|
Post by Q3 on Dec 13, 2013 2:40:58 GMT -5
Note: Bold and black comments are Daenerys. I inserted my comments in blue. Q3.Sonisphere was suppose to be a one time special event gig. When that got cancelled Queen scrambled for make up dates that led to the UK gigs. Kiev was a charity event. Again a special occasion gig. If there was a US TSP tour Adam would have been too busy with his own tour. We just will never know. When Adam's first era was successful and people asked him about Queen he didn't hesitate to say his career comes first we'll see in the future. Right now Adam is Queen go to guy. Like Talon said Queen talks up anyone who they are currently working with. What were they suppose to say to an interviewer coming of a successful show with Adam. No doubt in my mind that other guests would have been just as easy since FUN got featured twice. Legends like Queen get invited to events like this all the time with guest artists more than willing to join them. I do know for a fact without Queen there would have been no Adam invite by iHeart, At least not this year. As for Queen selling out arenas here in US. that's a complete contradiction to your past post where you said no way can Queen sellout MSG which I agreed with you than. Queen tour in 1977 was with Freddie not Adam. PR and Queen wasn't a the huge tour success either. I'm sure they can fill some some arenas here but MSG, nope. My guess is a handful of gigs if any at all they will do. Queen music in the US still sells well because we are now in a digital age. A lot of those sales are from people who already had the albums and are updating to their electronics. Adam could have done the 2012 QAL dates and toured for Trespassing starting in August. You wrote, "When Adam's first era was successful and people asked him about Queen he didn't hesitate to say his career comes first we'll see in the future." This is not what Adam said. In August 2010 during the GNT, Adam responded to the rumors that Adam was going to be the new lead signer for Queen. If you listen to the interview at the link below, he said, "I would not rule it out." Listen to the Queen-Rolling Stone iHRMF backstage interview -- they were not asked a question about Adam, Roger and Brian are the ones who bring Adam up and credit Adam for being the reason they were there. ive If you know for a fact that Queen would have been there, with or without Adam, please provide a link or source. As I posted previously, the FUN collab was put together after they were booked. Source is the iHRMF interview with Natt Ruess. "Queen music in the US still sells well because we are now in a digital age. A lot of those sales are from people who already had the albums and are updating to their electronics." Current digital sales are low, but steady: Nothing from Queen is on the top 400 in the US on iTunes or Amazon right now. The Platinium Collection is #51 on the ROCK album chart -- a genre which is mostly catalog sales. Five tracks are on the iTunes ROCK singles chart: BoRap (1975), WWRY (1976), WRTC (1977), ABTD (1980), STL (1976). Sales from 1975-1980 in the US, plus sales of the Greatest Hits albums (GH1, PC), make up most of the Queen US sales. Queen music sold very well in the US until they shifted from rock and rock ballads to whatever genre "Hot Space" is in 1980. This was a time period when the US and UK musically diverged. The post 1980 music has never sold well here. Regarding MSG -- You wrote, "As for Queen selling out arenas here in US. that's a complete contradiction to your past post where you said no way can Queen sellout MSG which I agreed with you than." I never wrote that. Here is what I wrote on 11.19.13 -- ** And you can tell I wrote it because it contain a typo! I still believe QAL needs to be a special event or a multi-artist concert or for a compelling cause or something else to sellout MSG. That is not a contradiction with my most recent post that Queen + AL would need to promote the concert.
|
|
|
Post by Q3 on Dec 13, 2013 2:50:14 GMT -5
Outside the internet bubble his exposure is non existing. Occasionally he gets a mention on OMG insider, E! News, ET but the impact isn't there yet. The general public has seen him most recently only twice on Glee. All those "OMG! where has Adam Lambert been" tweets from Glee fans is because other than his yearly Idol appearance the general public rarely sees him. I hope all that will change. God, I wish Fox offered him his own Elliott/Starchild spinoff series. This is actually not correct. Adam is in dozens of print magazine, and routinely in newspaper articles. Adam is not in a promo cycle -- so there is no reason for him to be on TV. When he has something to promote, he gets coverage. Look at iHR and Glee. He was on Ryan Seacrest's radio program, on all the iHR stations (1,300+ US stations), Ellen 2 time, etc. He has been in articles in the print edition of EW and Rolling Stone. ETC ETC. And just no, to an Elliott/Starchild spinoff series on Fox. ** But do not diminish his digital power -- American's now spend more time online than watching TV plus many US TV viewers are online while they watch TV.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2013 2:50:49 GMT -5
Daenerys - you're kinda bamf like the original Daenerys:). Thought provoking discussion and some good points I think. Hope you post more often.
|
|
|
Post by Daenerys on Dec 13, 2013 3:14:36 GMT -5
Outside the internet bubble his exposure is non existing. Occasionally he gets a mention on OMG insider, E! News, ET but the impact isn't there yet. The general public has seen him most recently only twice on Glee. All those "OMG! where has Adam Lambert been" tweets from Glee fans is because other than his yearly Idol appearance the general public rarely sees him. I hope all that will change. God, I wish Fox offered him his own Elliott/Starchild spinoff series. This is actually not correct. Adam is in dozens of print magazine, and routinely in newspaper articles. Adam is not in a promo cycle -- so there is no reason for him to be on TV. When he has something to promote, he gets coverage. Look at iHR and Glee. He was on Ryan Seacrest's radio program, on all the iHR stations (1,300+ US stations), Ellen 2 time, etc. He has been in articles in the print edition of EW and Rolling Stone. ETC ETC. And just no, to an Elliott/Starchild spinoff series on Fox. ** But do not diminish his digital power -- American's now spend more time online than watching TV plus many US TV viewers are online while they watch TV. If you read the the whole conversation with the MSG link you gave the gist is that most of the posters disagreed with you that Adam/Queen couldn't fill MSG. I'm not the only one who read that way. As for tying a special event for that to happen only if you booked other artists or an HBO event. Other than that it goes back to what I said They couldn't fill it. This is actually not correct. Adam is in dozens of print magazine, and routinely in newspaper articles.If your happy with crumbs. I guess. His print magazine and newspaper mentions is not at all uncommon. Follow another artist at his level you'll get the same results. When you follow just Adam you would think he's the only one getting so much coverage. He rarely gets exposure outside the internet prints. I'm not saying he isn't getting any at all. Obviously during down time there are things not to expect but when he was in promo mode album 2 he got the same retread promo as era 1. But we'll see album 3.
|
|
restless
Member
Equality. Duh. (credit to STRFKR)
Posts: 358
Location:
|
Post by restless on Dec 13, 2013 3:38:39 GMT -5
I could not give you the verbatim quotes, but I certainly remember when the rumors were flying that Adam would be "Queen's new lead singer" I am remembering the time right off idol.....Adam initially responded he was not interested in doing that and wanted to focus on his own music, a future collaboration might be nice, etc.. That future collab happened with his appearance at EMAs, in my mind anyway. Then we see the European and London gigs...the Iheart... and more speculation about QAL. For a fan like me, I ponder what happened and I have very mixed feelings. I don't think we would have seen this if his sophomore album (or FYE for that matter) had be the anticipated success it wasn't. And for an Adam Lambert fan, that bums me out. But as was astutely pointed out paths may change. Performing with Queen was, I can only imagine, a financial success for Adam, not to mention a great experience. And obviously a lot of Adam's hardcore fans were/are ecstatic about it. The dialogue on this thread has been interesting. Seeing and hearing Adam with "Queen" has been ok, but I would rather Adam not need to go there. And I think that is what is at the heart of this discussion.
Onward to 2014!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Location:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2013 4:09:34 GMT -5
I could not give you the verbatim quotes, but I certainly remember when the rumors were flying that Adam would be "Queen's new lead singer" I am remembering the time right off idol.....Adam initially responded he was not interested in doing that and wanted to focus on his own music, a future collaboration might be nice, etc.. That future collab happened with his appearance at EMAs, in my mind anyway. Then we see the European and London gigs...the Iheart... and more speculation about QAL. For a fan like me, I ponder what happened and I have very mixed feelings. I don't think we would have seen this if his sophomore album (or FYE for that matter) had be the anticipated success it wasn't. And for an Adam Lambert fan, that bums me out. But as was astutely pointed out paths may change. Performing with Queen was, I can only imagine, a financial success for Adam, not to mention a great experience. And obviously a lot of Adam's hardcore fans were/are ecstatic about it. The dialogue on this thread has been interesting. Seeing and hearing Adam with "Queen" has been ok, but I would rather Adam not need to go there. And I think that is what is at the heart of this discussion. Onward to 2014! I think this interview is representative of Adam's feelings re:his priorities and the Queen collab.
www.vh1.com/music/tuner/2012-02-03/adam-lambert-queen-rumors/
|
|
3ku1
Member
Posts: 3,009
Location:
|
Post by 3ku1 on Dec 13, 2013 5:24:02 GMT -5
Just wanted to join in the conversation and say I am sure Adam wants superstardom, the whole reason he auditioned for idol was to become a recording artist. Obviousley he diddnt predict his fame after the show, I see alot of people talking about his US success, yes that is a very important market to break into, but its also the hardest and most harshest. Its also not the only market, internationally Adam is as current as all the contemporary pop stars, particularly in Asia, NZ, and Australia. Adams career trajectoey is very different from the likes of jb or swift. Their demographic and audience is much broader and bigger then Adams, he has the potential to be their but he needs to expand his fanbase, and gigs like Glee and Queen all go a long way. Can I also say too I am glad Adam diddnt take the mid-ballad route in 2009, it would of garnered him fame, but I think it would be very boring for Adam and his fans.
Say what you want about his Ama performance but it gave him international attention. It also was the first time he was given the freedom to break away from the "idol kid", so he could be ADAM LAMBERT. It also stopped the industry and the public from labelling him as the nice gay kid from idol, it allowed him to be himself something most reality star singers dont get, particularly with the tag of "only here because of American Idol". Adam is not the kinda artist who is going to sell billions in a week, or go #1 on the Billboard Chart in a week, or sell out all the biggest arenas around the world like Taylor Swift, Gaga, Beyonce, Madonna, Jb are presently. How can he its just not where is career is at right now, so its unrealistic to expect that kinda mega star status from him.
He's a big picture artist, a potential multi platnum selling arena artist. It is true image sells, for Taylor shes the sweet, down to earth southern belle country girl sweet heart who girls look up to. Country is huge in the states, so she has a blueprint, she has also managed with Red to fuse it with a more folk sounding pop sound she has sold millions around the world. With Adam his image if you ask anyone is the rocker guy from idol, hes kinda a throwback to the 70's, yet at the same time theirs something very current about him. Rca really screwed up his rollout in 09, particularly his Uk release, releasing no music in two years was stupidity at its finest. Trespassing his a great pop album, but it could be the next Thriller but if your label are not putting money into your music, and radio are not playing you then your DOA.
I think Adam too and his management made a huge mistake with the pop/dance genre, its a female dominated genre, if radio can play KP or Gaga why would they play Adam Lambert. Another factor is Idols dont get a lot of airplay anymore, P2 was a rare exception, but generally dont. Theirs just too much competition in the reality show market now, why play last years winner when they can play this years. As a society we are very thickle our conciousness goes in and out, I remember an interview Adam had with Lyndsey Parker back in 2010 he said, most people who come off these shows fade away, I dont want to, I want to stake my claim, I want to be in it for the long haul.
When he came off idol everyone thought he was going to be the new metal guy, then he went really electronica with glam rock infusion, not to mention that cover haha. These things are hard to shake off even four to five years later, a big part of an artists theology is their story. Take KP she seemed to come from no where, to instant megastardom although she had been dropped by 3 labels. With Adam people see he came off idol, so theirs this misconception he diddnt work for his success (we all know he did). I think Queen has been invaluable for Adam, not just for the exp of working with legends but the connections he is making too. IHR regardless if he was their on his own merit or because of Queen doesent matter.
Point is he was their and making the right impressions to the right people, and Imo that well go a long way in having a radio presence in era 3. I also think he is a media darling at the moment, he seems to have built a good raport and relationship with the media. Regardless how long the collab with Queen goes for I dont think its a deadend, the response at iheart was pretty impactful, and their is demand in the states at least for QAL. Do I think their is enough demand for say MSG? No unless it was a festival or a multi artist event.
But they are big enough to sell out 7-8k in clubs. But I also want to see more focus on his own music, he needs to stop genre hopping, pick a lane. Their is a genre for him, I think a Darker Rock fused with Pop or Alt Rock Pop/Rock would be the way to go. I think also collabs with big names to break onto radio could help, love to see a KP collab. Sorry for the long post haha, but just end with saying Adams not at Taylor level yet, but in the longrun he could be this generations MJ IMHO, but he needs a label who well support and trust his vision.
|
|
talon
Member
Posts: 2,933
Location:
|
Post by talon on Dec 13, 2013 9:20:40 GMT -5
5 stops can lead to 10 stops. As we've seen with Adam/Queen 7 gigs isn't enough
Brian/Kerry will probably end up at about 10-15 stops if things go as they usually go. Not entirely true. They were HUGE in the US from the 1977-1982 era. And I'm not so uncertain that they couldn't fill MSG. On a limited run. QPR filled the Izod arena of 20,000 which is about what MSG is. I'm not saying it's a certainty - Not many artists sell out MSG these days.... And Glee might know more than you'd think considering there have been 8 Queen songs on Glee...
|
|