murly
Member
Life's my light and liberty and I shine when I want to shine.
Posts: 2,576
Location:
|
Post by murly on Jul 4, 2012 12:35:05 GMT -5
I'm still holding out hope for the Olympics. Adam may not be British, but he'll be singing British music with a British band. We saw what a jump Trespassing took on Amazon when the Kiev concert videos were posted; imagine what a performance at the closing ceremonies of the Olympics could do!
|
|
|
Post by teddybear on Jul 4, 2012 12:36:53 GMT -5
Tbh, they've no need for Adam at the Olympics. They'll prolly do one song or a short medley with the British artists that are already performing
|
|
|
Post by lambo on Jul 4, 2012 12:37:08 GMT -5
So I was wondering, why do we get yet another BTIKM remix as NCOE's B-side? What about one of the 30-ish leftover tracks we haven't heard?
|
|
savvy92
Member
Posts: 1,497
Location:
|
Post by savvy92 on Jul 4, 2012 12:37:13 GMT -5
I love that Adam's hotel rooms are now (probably)bigger than his LA apt before Idol.
|
|
|
Post by maria222pf on Jul 4, 2012 12:37:55 GMT -5
[/IMG] [/quote] Whenever I read that Adam's not Freddie Mercury.. I wanna say DUH of course he's not Freddie Mercury, he's Adam Lambert! Nice to see some open minded, open hearted Queen fans able to really hear Adam! [/quote] With all due respect some of the Queen entrenched diehards are making me want to scream - guys, Freddy is DEAD, dead dead and has been for over 21 years ! I could have more empathy if he had just died a couple of years ago, but he's been dead a whole generation. To me it seems like some Queen fans would love to fosilize him and the music- he was a part of Queen, he wasn't the whole band, Brian and Roger were an integral part if the band too - and their opinion is just as valid as Freddy's would have been. I have lost any empathy I had for the Queen diehards and will now focus on Queenbert's amazingly joyful performances. I will be scrolling past any negativity - NOONE is going to harsh the mellow and joy I have been feeling over the last few days.
|
|
Holst
Member
Posts: 4,786
Location:
|
Post by Holst on Jul 4, 2012 12:41:23 GMT -5
Yes I finally found it! I have a Mac. I thought it would go directly to iTunes, but it didn't and it's sitting in a folder. Not sure how to move it to iTunes now.. it's a MPEG4. Thanks for asking! It should work the same way as on Windows. Put the video in a folder where you want it. Start up iTunes. Click on the "File" tab and then "Add file to Library" in the drop down menu. Locate the video file in the pop up file chooser. Click on "Movies" in iTunes and you should see a list of videos including the one you just imported. I'm on a Mac and just drag and drop files into iTunes after downloading them.
|
|
cookeejar
Member
eyes baby eyes
Posts: 961
Location:
|
Post by cookeejar on Jul 4, 2012 12:43:40 GMT -5
I was in Harris Teater earlier today and Adam was on the radio singing 'No Boundaries" I had to laugh but it had me smiling.
|
|
kryptoman68
Member
"One day the world will understand!" Nile Rodgers
Posts: 1,092
Location:
|
Post by kryptoman68 on Jul 4, 2012 12:48:58 GMT -5
Thanks Talon I will look forward to your link to the FLAC files. Whats the difference between FLAC and wav files? I am very ignorant. I've a little audio recorder that I used at Adam's first solo concert and it recorded in wav format. I'm no audio expert but basically FLAC and Wav are very comparable - both far better than Mp3. I believe FLAC and Wav sound is actually identical - FLAC though takes up less space and you can tag the file with information any way you want. *shrug* I usually convert to Mp3 for myself so I can listen on my ipod anyways... WAV is the uncompressed audio file format of MS Windows. The files tend to be large, but they contain all the information that was originally sampled (since an analog audio wave converted by a microphone has to be "digitized" by sampling it at small intervals and recording the values found at each sample, the quality depends on how often the wave is sampled). Low sample rates can produce noticeably lower quality sound, but save disk space. MP3 is based on research by the Fraunhofer Institute in Germany and is based on the fact that the human ear cannot distinguish all frequencies or combinations thereof equally well. So they came up with a way to remove all the stuff the human wouldn't hear anyway, thus compressing using a "lossy" algorithm. The compressed MP3 does NOT represent the original waveform, but is perceptually equivalent. In other words, while the file is getting smaller, the quality is degrading less noticeably. Btw, this is very similar to how pictures are compressed in the JPEG format by removing data that the eye would not see, and videos are compressed by pretty much all codecs out there, esp. the MPEG ones. FLAC combines the best of the two worlds by storing the data a WAV file would contain, but in a compressed stream similar to how ZIP files deflate information by finding repeating patterns and storing them only once. But since FLAC was specifically optimized for finding these patterns in audio data, it works even better than ZIP compression on WAV files. This kind of compression is called "lossless" - after all, if you zip a text document in an archive, you expect to get the EXACT same document after unzipping. Thus, you get the benefit of high quality audio exactly as sampled, but stored using much less space without losing any information. This is similar to how GIF and PNG image files are compressed btw. - both formats don't discard data, and I generally prefer PNG over JPG for my images, but that's another story.
|
|
|
Post by houselady on Jul 4, 2012 12:52:06 GMT -5
Poland twitter list (for those interested this early): twitter.com/#!/Sroczka79/queen-and-adam-in-poland
|
|
|
Post by gracefuladam on Jul 4, 2012 12:53:27 GMT -5
Plz vote once an hour here. It counts on Canada's charts www.muchmore.ca/mmtop20/And now my nagging is done! Happy 4th of July, guys!! Thanks for the reminder, mys*&@^#r. You've all probably thought of this. I finally figured out that, in order to request throughout each day, it is easier to bookmark all the key request links in one folder. Then just go through that folder when able throughout the day. Otherwise I keep responding to a link here or there after going through all of them in the morning. Anyway seems more methodical and therefore consistently do-able for me.
|
|